• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

县乳房X光检查的接受情况可根据健康的社会决定因素进行预测,但这些模式并不适用于个体患者。

County Mammogram Uptake can be Predicted from Social Determinants of Health, but Patterns Do Not Hold for Individual Patients.

作者信息

Davis Matthew, Simpson Kit, Diaz Vanessa, Alekseyenko Alexander V

机构信息

Biomedical Informatics Center, Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29403, USA.

Department of Public Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29403, USA.

出版信息

Fortune J Health Sci. 2024 Mar;7(1):128-137. doi: 10.26502/fjhs.171. Epub 2024 Feb 17.

DOI:10.26502/fjhs.171
PMID:38651007
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11034937/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of this study is to describe patterns in barriers to breast cancer screening uptake with the end goal of improving screening adherence and decreasing the burden of mortality due to breast cancer. This study looks at social determinants of health and their association to screening and mortality. It also investigates the extent that models trained on county data are generalizable to individuals.

METHODS

County level screening uptake and age adjusted mortality due to breast cancer are combined with the Centers for Disease Controls Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) to train a model predicting screening uptake rates. Patterns learned are then applied to de-identified electronic medical records from individual patients to make predictions on mammogram screening follow through.

RESULTS

Accurate predictions can be made about a county's breast cancer screening uptake with the SVI. However, the association between increased screening, and decreased age adjusted mortality, doesn't hold in areas with a high proportion of minority residents. It is also shown that patterns learned from county SVI data have little discriminative power at the patient level.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that social determinants in the SVI can explain much of the variance in county breast cancer screening rates. However, these same patterns fail to discriminate which patients will have timely follow through of a mammogram screening test. This study also concludes that the core association between increased screening and decreased age adjusted mortality does not hold in high proportion minority areas.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study is to describe patterns in social determinants of health and their association with female breast cancer screening uptake, age adjusted breast cancer mortality rate and the extent that models trained on county data are generalizable to individuals.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是描述乳腺癌筛查接受障碍的模式,最终目标是提高筛查依从性并减轻乳腺癌导致的死亡负担。本研究着眼于健康的社会决定因素及其与筛查和死亡率的关联。它还调查了基于县数据训练的模型对个体的可推广程度。

方法

将县级筛查接受率和经年龄调整的乳腺癌死亡率与疾病控制中心的社会脆弱性指数(SVI)相结合,以训练一个预测筛查接受率的模型。然后将学到的模式应用于个体患者的去识别电子病历,以预测乳房X光检查的后续情况。

结果

利用SVI可以对一个县的乳腺癌筛查接受情况做出准确预测。然而,在少数族裔居民比例较高的地区,筛查增加与经年龄调整的死亡率降低之间的关联并不成立。研究还表明,从县SVI数据中学到的模式在患者层面几乎没有鉴别力。

结论

本研究表明,SVI中的社会决定因素可以解释县乳腺癌筛查率的大部分差异。然而,这些相同的模式无法区分哪些患者会及时进行乳房X光筛查。本研究还得出结论,在少数族裔比例较高的地区,筛查增加与经年龄调整的死亡率降低之间的核心关联并不成立。

目的

本研究的目的是描述健康的社会决定因素模式及其与女性乳腺癌筛查接受情况、经年龄调整的乳腺癌死亡率的关联,以及基于县数据训练的模型对个体的可推广程度。

相似文献

1
County Mammogram Uptake can be Predicted from Social Determinants of Health, but Patterns Do Not Hold for Individual Patients.县乳房X光检查的接受情况可根据健康的社会决定因素进行预测,但这些模式并不适用于个体患者。
Fortune J Health Sci. 2024 Mar;7(1):128-137. doi: 10.26502/fjhs.171. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
2
Mammogram Uptake from Social Determinants of Health Can Be Lost in Translation to Individual Patients.从健康的社会决定因素得出的乳房X光检查接受率在转化为个体患者情况时可能会出现信息丢失。
Res Sq. 2023 Aug 31:rs.3.rs-3298459. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3298459/v1.
3
County-Level Social Vulnerability and Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates in the US, 2018.美国 2018 年县级社会脆弱性与乳腺癌、宫颈癌和结直肠癌筛查率
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2233429. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33429.
4
Association of US county-level social vulnerability index with breast, colorectal, and lung cancer screening, incidence, and mortality rates across US counties.美国县级社会脆弱性指数与美国各县乳腺癌、结直肠癌和肺癌筛查、发病率及死亡率的关联
Front Oncol. 2024 Aug 7;14:1422475. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1422475. eCollection 2024.
5
Social vulnerability index and age-adjusted mortality from all causes by county: Mississippi 2016-2020.社会脆弱性指数和按县划分的全因年龄调整死亡率:密西西比州 2016-2020 年。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2024 Jun;116(3):302-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jnma.2024.05.003. Epub 2024 May 20.
6
Social Vulnerability and Sickle Cell Disease Mortality in the US.美国的社会脆弱性与镰状细胞病死亡率
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Sep 3;7(9):e2440599. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40599.
7
Impact of Social Vulnerability on Comorbid Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease Mortality in the United States.社会脆弱性对美国癌症与心血管疾病合并症死亡率的影响
JACC CardioOncol. 2022 Sep 20;4(3):326-337. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2022.06.005. eCollection 2022 Sep.
8
Association of County-degree Social Vulnerability with Chronic Respiratory Disease Mortality in the United States.县级社会脆弱性与美国慢性呼吸系统疾病死亡率的关系。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023 Jan;20(1):47-57. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202202-136OC.
9
County-level Social Vulnerability is Associated With Worse Surgical Outcomes Especially Among Minority Patients.县级社会脆弱性与手术结果较差相关,尤其是在少数民族患者中。
Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):881-891. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004691.
10
Socioeconomic Determinants of COVID-19 Incidence and Mortality in Florida.佛罗里达州新冠病毒疾病发病率和死亡率的社会经济决定因素
Cureus. 2022 Feb 22;14(2):e22491. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22491. eCollection 2022 Feb.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting Mammogram Screening Follow Through with Electronic Health Record and Geographically Linked Data.利用电子健康记录和地理链接数据预测乳房 X 光筛查的后续情况。
Cancer Res Commun. 2023 Oct 19;3(10):2126-2132. doi: 10.1158/2767-9764.CRC-23-0263.
2
Be careful with ecological associations.注意生态关联。
Nephrology (Carlton). 2021 Jun;26(6):501-505. doi: 10.1111/nep.13861. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
3
A Novel BN Learning Algorithm Based on Block Learning Strategy.基于分块学习策略的新型贝叶斯网络学习算法。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Nov 7;20(21):6357. doi: 10.3390/s20216357.
4
County-Level Factors Predicting Low Uptake of Screening Mammography.县级因素预测筛查性乳房 X 光摄影的低利用率。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Sep;211(3):624-629. doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.19541. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
5
Algorithms for Discovery of Multiple Markov Boundaries.用于发现多个马尔可夫边界的算法。
J Mach Learn Res. 2013 Feb;14:499-566.
6
An introduction to causal inference.因果推断导论。
Int J Biostat. 2010 Feb 26;6(2):Article 7. doi: 10.2202/1557-4679.1203.
7
Social determinants of Black-White disparities in breast cancer mortality: a review.乳腺癌死亡率中黑人与白人差异的社会决定因素:综述
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2008 Nov;17(11):2913-23. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0633.