Rubin Molly, Lecker Stewart H, Ramkumar Nirupama, Sozio Stephen M, Hoover Robert S, Zeidel Mark L, Ko Benjamin S
ASN Alliance for Kidney Health, Washington, DC.
Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2024 Apr 23;35(9):1284-91. doi: 10.1681/ASN.0000000000000384.
In response to decreasing numbers of individuals entering into nephrology fellowships, the American Society of Nephrology launched Kidney Tutored Research and Education for Kidney Scholars (TREKS) to stimulate interest in nephrology among medical students, graduate students, and postdoctoral fellows. The program combines a 1-week intensive exposure to kidney physiology with a longitudinal mentorship program at the participants' home institutions. Ten years in, an analysis was conducted to assess its effectiveness. We surveyed participants to assess their opinions regarding nephrology before and after the course and followed them longitudinally to determine their career choices. TREKS applicants who were not selected to participate were used as a comparison group. Three hundred eighty-one people participated in the program, and 242 completed the survey. After TREKS, both medical students and graduate students showed increased interest in nephrology, with rank scores of 5.6±0.2 before to 7.5±0.1 after the course for medical students (mean±SD, n =189, P = 0.001) and 7.3±0.3 to 8.7±0.3 ( n =53, P = 0.001) for graduate students. In long-term follow-up, TREKS medical students chose a nephrology pipeline residency at a higher rate than medical students overall (57% versus 31%, P = 0.01) and TREKS applicants who did not participate (47% versus 31%, P = 0.04). Nephrology fellowship rates for these groups exceeded the general population but did not significantly differ between TREKS participants and applicants. Doctor of Philosophy students and postdoctoral TREKS participants had a higher rate of participation in nephrology research compared with TREKS applicants (66% versus 30%, P = 0.01). In summary, the American Society of Nephrology Kidney TREKS program has demonstrated that it can increase interest in nephrology in the short term and increase the number of individuals going into nephrology careers. This long-term effect is most evident in Doctor of Philosophy students and postdoctoral participants. Further study is needed to assess the impact of TREKS on enrollment in nephrology fellowship programs.
鉴于进入肾脏病学进修项目的人数不断减少,美国肾脏病学会发起了面向肾脏学者的肾脏辅导研究与教育项目(TREKS),以激发医学生、研究生和博士后对肾脏病学的兴趣。该项目将为期1周的肾脏生理学强化培训与在参与者所在机构的长期导师指导项目相结合。项目开展十年后,进行了一项分析以评估其效果。我们对参与者进行了调查,以评估他们在课程前后对肾脏病学的看法,并对他们进行长期跟踪以确定他们的职业选择。未被选中参加的TREKS申请者被用作对照组。381人参与了该项目,242人完成了调查。参加TREKS项目后,医学生和研究生对肾脏病学的兴趣均有所增加,医学生的排名得分从课程前的5.6±0.2提高到课程后的7.5±0.1(均值±标准差,n = 189,P = 0.001),研究生从7.3±0.3提高到8.7±0.3(n = 53,P = 0.001)。在长期随访中,参加TREKS项目的医学生选择肾脏病学专业住院医师培训的比例高于总体医学生(57%对31%,P = 0.01)以及未参加的TREKS申请者(47%对31%,P = 0.04)。这些群体的肾脏病学进修率超过了普通人群,但TREKS参与者和申请者之间没有显著差异。与TREKS申请者相比,哲学博士学生和参加TREKS项目的博士后参与肾脏病学研究的比例更高(66%对30%,P = 0.01)。总之,美国肾脏病学会的肾脏TREKS项目已证明,它可以在短期内提高对肾脏病学的兴趣,并增加从事肾脏病学职业的人数。这种长期影响在哲学博士学生和博士后参与者中最为明显。需要进一步研究以评估TREKS对肾脏病学进修项目招生的影响。