Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
School of Information, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Fam Med. 2024 May;56(5):321-324. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2024.592756. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, virtual care expanded rapidly at Michigan Medicine and other health systems. From family physicians' perspectives, this shift to virtual care has the potential to affect workflow, job satisfaction, and patient communication. As clinics reopened and care delivery models shifted to a combination of in-person and virtual care, the need to understand physician experiences with virtual care arose in order to improve both patient and provider experiences. This study investigated Michigan Medicine family medicine physicians' perceptions of virtual care through qualitative interviews to better understand how to improve the quality and effectiveness of virtual care for both patients and physicians.
We employed a qualitative descriptive design to examine physician perspectives through semistructured interviews. We coded and analyzed transcripts using thematic analysis, facilitated by MAXQDA (VERBI) software.
The results of the analysis identified four major themes: (a) chief concerns that are appropriate for virtual evaluation, (b) physician perceptions of patient benefits, (c) focused but contextually enriched patient-physician communication, and (d) structural support needed for high-quality virtual care.
These findings can help further direct the discussion of how to make use of resources to improve the quality and effectiveness of virtual care.
在 COVID-19 大流行期间,虚拟医疗在密歇根大学医学中心和其他医疗系统中迅速扩张。从家庭医生的角度来看,这种向虚拟医疗的转变有可能影响工作流程、工作满意度和患者沟通。随着诊所重新开放,以及护理模式向面对面和虚拟护理相结合的方式转变,为了提高患者和医生的体验,有必要了解医生对虚拟护理的体验,以便提高虚拟护理的质量和效果。本研究通过定性访谈调查了密歇根大学医学中心家庭医生对虚拟护理的看法,以更好地了解如何提高虚拟护理对患者和医生的质量和效果。
我们采用定性描述性设计,通过半结构化访谈来考察医生的观点。我们使用 MAXQDA(VERBI)软件进行主题分析,以促进对转录本的编码和分析。
分析结果确定了四个主要主题:(a) 适合虚拟评估的主要关注点,(b) 医生对患者受益的看法,(c) 重点突出但上下文丰富的医患沟通,以及(d) 高质量虚拟护理所需的结构支持。
这些发现可以帮助进一步指导如何利用资源提高虚拟护理的质量和效果的讨论。