Guetterman Timothy C, Koptyra Emily, Ritchie Olivia, Marquis Liz B, Kadri Reema, Laurie Anna, Vydiswaran Vg Vinod, Li Jiazhao, Brown Lindsay K, Veinot Tiffany C, Buis Lorraine R
Department of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
College of Human Medicine, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
J Telemed Telecare. 2025 Apr;31(3):408-416. doi: 10.1177/1357633X231194382. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
BackgroundVirtual care expanded rapidly during the COVID-19 pandemic, and how this shift affected healthcare disparities among subgroups of patients is of concern. Racial and ethnic minorities, older adults, individuals with less education, and lower-income households have lower rates of home broadband, smartphone ownership, and patient portal adoption, which may directly affect access to virtual care. Because primary care is a major access point to healthcare, perspectives of primary care providers are critical to inform the implementation of equitable virtual care.ObjectiveThe aim of this mixed methods study was to explore primary care physician experiences and perceptions of barriers and facilitators to equitable virtual care.DesignWe used an explanatory sequential mixed methods design, which consists of first collecting and analyzing quantitative survey data, then using those results to inform a qualitative follow-up phase to explain and expand on results.ParticipantsPrimary care physicians in a family medicine department at an academic medical center responded to surveys ( = 38) and participated in interviews ( = 16).ApproachParticipants completed a survey concerning frequency and preferences about video visits, pros and cons of video visits, communication aspects, and sufficiency of the technology. A purposeful sample of participants completed semi-structured interviews about their virtual care experiences with a focus on equity for subpopulations.Key ResultsThe results indicated that physicians have observed equity issues for unique patient populations. The results add to the understanding of nuanced ways in which virtual care can increase and decrease healthcare access for unique populations. Patients with limited English proficiency were particularly affected by inequity in virtual care access.ConclusionAdditional research and interventions are needed to improve portal access for those with limited English proficiency. Improvements should focus on health system interventions that expand access without requiring increased patient burden.
背景
在新冠疫情期间,虚拟医疗迅速扩张,这种转变如何影响不同患者亚群体之间的医疗差距备受关注。少数族裔、老年人、受教育程度较低者以及低收入家庭拥有家庭宽带、智能手机和采用患者门户网站的比例较低,这可能直接影响到虚拟医疗的可及性。由于初级保健是医疗服务的主要接入点,初级保健提供者的观点对于公平实施虚拟医疗至关重要。
目的
本混合方法研究的目的是探讨初级保健医生对公平虚拟医疗的障碍和促进因素的经验及看法。
设计
我们采用了解释性序列混合方法设计,首先收集和分析定量调查数据,然后利用这些结果为定性后续阶段提供信息,以解释和扩展结果。
参与者
一所学术医疗中心家庭医学科的初级保健医生参与了调查(n = 38)并参加了访谈(n = 16)。
方法
参与者完成了一项关于视频问诊频率和偏好、视频问诊利弊、沟通方面以及技术充足性的调查。有目的地抽取一部分参与者完成了关于他们虚拟医疗经历的半结构化访谈,重点关注亚人群的公平性。
关键结果
结果表明,医生已经观察到特定患者群体存在的公平性问题。这些结果有助于加深对虚拟医疗以细微方式增加或减少特定人群医疗可及性的理解。英语水平有限的患者在虚拟医疗可及性方面尤其受到不公平的影响。
结论
需要进行更多研究和干预,以改善英语水平有限者的门户网站接入情况。改进应侧重于扩大可及性而不增加患者负担的卫生系统干预措施。