• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大辩论:急性护理环境中的机器人与传统手术方法。

The Great Debate: Robotic vs Traditional Surgical Approach in the Acute Care Setting.

机构信息

Division of Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keck USC School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Division of Acute Care Surgery, Kaweah Health Medical Center, Visalia, CA, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2024 Oct;90(10):2357-2361. doi: 10.1177/00031348241248802. Epub 2024 Apr 24.

DOI:10.1177/00031348241248802
PMID:38655609
Abstract

Robotic surgery was first introduced in the 1980s as a system to aid patients in the battlefield. Since then, robotic surgery has become an important minimally invasive tool and plays an important role in elective surgery among various surgical specialties. However, the role for robotic surgery in the emergent setting is not well established or studied. Robotic surgery has been shown to be advantageous to both patients and operating surgeons. Though limited, studies have found robotic surgery in the acute setting to be safe for patients. These studies found robotic surgery to have improved perioperative outcomes when compared to an open or laparoscopic approach. Additionally, the robotic platform is thought to be an effective tool to prevent conversion to open procedures in emergent settings. Although some studies demonstrate advantages to robotic acute surgery, others have shown increased complications with robotic acute surgery or no distinct advantage when comparing robotic to laparoscopic surgery. Additionally, some of the published papers supporting the use of robotic surgery in the emergent setting may have a degree of bias favoring the robotic platform. Robotic surgery is a mainstay in minimally invasive elective surgery and gaining popularity among patients and surgeons. There are pros and cons to the adaptation of the robotic platform in the acute care setting. Additional large population studies are indicated to determine the true role of the robotic platform in the emergent setting.

摘要

机器人手术最早于 20 世纪 80 年代被引入,作为一种辅助战场上患者的系统。从那时起,机器人手术已成为一种重要的微创手术工具,并在各外科专业的择期手术中发挥着重要作用。然而,机器人手术在紧急情况下的作用尚未得到充分确立或研究。机器人手术对患者和手术医生都有优势。尽管有限,但研究发现,在急性情况下,机器人手术对患者是安全的。这些研究发现,与开放或腹腔镜方法相比,机器人手术在围手术期有更好的结果。此外,机器人平台被认为是一种有效的工具,可以防止在紧急情况下转为开放手术。虽然一些研究表明机器人急性手术有优势,但其他研究表明机器人急性手术的并发症增加,或者与腹腔镜手术相比没有明显优势。此外,一些支持在紧急情况下使用机器人手术的已发表论文可能存在一定程度的偏向机器人平台的偏见。机器人手术是微创手术的主要手段,越来越受到患者和外科医生的欢迎。机器人平台在急性护理环境中的应用有其优点和缺点。需要进行更多的大型人群研究,以确定机器人平台在紧急情况下的真正作用。

相似文献

1
The Great Debate: Robotic vs Traditional Surgical Approach in the Acute Care Setting.大辩论:急性护理环境中的机器人与传统手术方法。
Am Surg. 2024 Oct;90(10):2357-2361. doi: 10.1177/00031348241248802. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
2
Incidence, associated risk factors, and impact of conversion to laparotomy in elective minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease.择期微创乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室病中转开腹的发生率、相关危险因素及影响。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Feb;34(2):598-609. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06804-z. Epub 2019 May 6.
3
Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy.开腹、腹腔镜及机器人辅助全腹结肠切除术的比较
Surg Endosc. 2016 Jul;30(7):2792-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4552-8. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
4
Robotic Technology in Emergency General Surgery Cases in the Era of Minimally Invasive Surgery.机器人技术在微创外科时代的急诊普通外科手术中的应用。
JAMA Surg. 2024 May 1;159(5):493-499. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0016.
5
A comparative analysis of outcomes of open, laparoscopic, and robotic elective (procto-) colectomies for benign and malignant disease.开腹、腹腔镜和机器人择期(直肠-)结肠切除术治疗良恶性疾病的结局比较分析。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Feb;15(1):53-62. doi: 10.1007/s11701-020-01069-4. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
6
Robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery in the emergency setting: a systematic review.机器人与腹腔镜普通外科手术在急诊环境中的比较:系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jul 5;18(1):281. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02016-3.
7
A Comparison of Pathologic Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Resections for Rectal Cancer Using the ACS-NSQIP Proctectomy-Targeted Database: a Propensity Score Analysis.使用 ACS-NSQIP 直肠切除术靶向数据库比较开放、腹腔镜和机器人直肠癌切除术的病理结果:倾向评分分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2019 Feb;23(2):348-356. doi: 10.1007/s11605-018-3974-8. Epub 2018 Sep 27.
8
Minimally invasive approach to hiatal hernia repair is superior to open, even in the emergent setting: a large national database analysis.即使在紧急情况下,微创方法治疗食管裂孔疝也优于开放手术:一项大型全国数据库分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jan;35(1):423-428. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07404-y. Epub 2020 Feb 10.
9
Robotic Assistance Confers Ambidexterity to Laparoscopic Surgeons.机器人辅助赋予腹腔镜医师双手操作能力。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2018 Jan;25(1):76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
10
Trends and consequences of surgical conversion in the United States.美国外科手术中转的趋势和后果。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Jan;36(1):82-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08240-w. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Safety and feasibility of robotic surgery in acute care setting: a systematic review.机器人手术在急症护理环境中的安全性和可行性:一项系统评价。
J Robot Surg. 2025 Aug 6;19(1):454. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02630-9.