PharMetrX Graduate Research Training Program, Berlin/Potsdam, Germany.
Institute of Mathematics, Mathematical Modelling and Systems Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Sep;116(3):795-806. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3274. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
Warfarin dosing remains challenging due to substantial inter-individual variability, which can lead to unsafe or ineffective therapy with standard dosing. Model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) can help individualize warfarin dosing, requiring the selection of a suitable model. For models developed from clinical data, the dependence on the study design and population raises questions about generalizability. Quantitative system pharmacology (QSP) models promise better extrapolation abilities; however, their complexity and lack of validation on clinical data raise questions about applicability in MIPD. We have previously derived a mechanistic warfarin/international normalized ratio (INR) model from a blood coagulation QSP model. In this article, we evaluated the predictive performance of the warfarin/INR model in the context of MIPD using an external dataset with INR data from patients starting warfarin treatment. We assessed the accuracy and precision of model predictions, benchmarked against an empirically based reference model. Additionally, we evaluated covariate contributions and assessed the predictive performance separately in the more challenging outpatient data. The warfarin/INR model performed comparably to the reference model across various measures despite not being calibrated with warfarin initiation data. Including CYP2C9 and/or VKORC1 genotypes as covariates improved the prediction quality of the warfarin/INR model, even after assimilating 4 days of INR data. The outpatient INR exhibited higher unexplained variability, and predictions slightly exceeded observed values, suggesting that model adjustments might be necessary when transitioning from an inpatient to an outpatient setting. Overall, this research underscores the potential of QSP-derived models for MIPD, offering a complementary approach to empirical model development.
由于个体间存在较大差异,华法林剂量仍然具有挑战性,这可能导致标准剂量治疗不安全或无效。模型指导下的精准用药(MIPD)可以帮助实现华法林剂量的个体化,这需要选择合适的模型。对于从临床数据中开发的模型,对研究设计和人群的依赖性引发了关于其通用性的问题。定量系统药理学(QSP)模型有望具有更好的外推能力;然而,其复杂性和缺乏对临床数据的验证引发了关于其在 MIPD 中适用性的问题。我们之前从凝血 QSP 模型中推导出了一种华法林/国际标准化比值(INR)的机制模型。在本文中,我们使用包含开始华法林治疗的患者 INR 数据的外部数据集,在 MIPD 背景下评估了华法林/INR 模型的预测性能。我们评估了模型预测的准确性和精密度,与基于经验的参考模型进行了基准比较。此外,我们还评估了协变量的贡献,并分别在更具挑战性的门诊数据中评估了预测性能。尽管华法林/INR 模型没有用华法林起始数据进行校准,但它在各种指标上的表现与参考模型相当。包括 CYP2C9 和/或 VKORC1 基因型作为协变量可以改善华法林/INR 模型的预测质量,即使在同化了 4 天的 INR 数据之后也是如此。门诊 INR 表现出更高的无法解释的变异性,预测值略微超过了观察值,这表明在从住院患者过渡到门诊患者时,可能需要对模型进行调整。总体而言,这项研究强调了 QSP 衍生模型在 MIPD 中的潜力,为经验模型开发提供了一种补充方法。