Department of Cardiology, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Department of Cardiology, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Cardiology Institute, Org. Abdurrahman Nafiz Gürman street. No: 24, 34098, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.
Herz. 2024 Oct;49(5):361-370. doi: 10.1007/s00059-024-05244-3. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of double kissing crush stenting (DKC) and mini-culotte technique (MCT) in patients with complex bifurcation lesions.
This retrospective study enrolled 236 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for complex coronary bifurcation disease between January 2014 and November 2022. The primary endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF), defined as the combination of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), or clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR). The secondary endpoint was major cardiovascular and cerebral events (MACCE) including all-cause death, MI, TLR, stroke, or stent thrombosis. The regression models were adjusted by applying the inverse probability weighted (IPW) approach to reduce treatment selection bias.
The initial management strategy was DKC in 154 (65.3%) patients and MCT in 82 (34.7%) patients (male: 194 [82.2%], mean age: 60.85 ± 10.86 years). The SYNTAX scores were similar in both groups. The rates of long-term TLF and MACCE rates were 17.4% and 20%, respectively. The rate of TLF (26.8% vs. 12.3%, p = 0.005) was higher in patients treated with MCT than those treated with the DKC technique, mainly driven by more frequent TLR (15.9% vs. 7.1%, p = 0.035). The long-term TLF and MACCE rates were notably lower in the DKC group compared to the others: adjusted hazard ratio (HR; IPW): 0.407, p = 0.009 for TLF, and adjusted HR(IPW): 0.391 [95% CI: 0.209-0.730], p = 0.003 for MACCE.
At long-term follow-up, the rates of TLF and MACCE were 17.4% and 20%, respectively. However, long-term TLF was significantly higher in patients treated with MCT than those treated with the DKC technique, primarily due to a more frequent occurrence of clinically driven TLR.
本研究旨在评估双吻挤压支架术(DKC)和迷你裤衩技术(MCT)在复杂分叉病变患者中的长期疗效。
这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了 2014 年 1 月至 2022 年 11 月期间接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的 236 例复杂冠状动脉分叉病变患者。主要终点是靶病变失败(TLF),定义为心源性死亡、心肌梗死(MI)或临床驱动的靶病变血运重建(TLR)的组合。次要终点是主要心血管和脑事件(MACCE),包括全因死亡、MI、TLR、卒中和支架血栓形成。采用逆概率加权(IPW)方法调整回归模型,以减少治疗选择偏倚。
初始治疗策略为 DKC 治疗 154 例(65.3%),MCT 治疗 82 例(34.7%)(男性:194 例[82.2%],平均年龄:60.85±10.86 岁)。两组患者的 SYNTAX 评分相似。两组患者的长期 TLF 和 MACCE 发生率分别为 17.4%和 20%。MCT 组 TLF 发生率(26.8% vs. 12.3%,p=0.005)高于 DKC 组,主要是由于 TLR 更频繁(15.9% vs. 7.1%,p=0.035)。与其他组相比,DKC 组的长期 TLF 和 MACCE 发生率明显较低:调整后的危险比(HR;IPW):0.407,p=0.009 用于 TLF,调整后的 HR(IPW):0.391 [95%CI:0.209-0.730],p=0.003 用于 MACCE。
在长期随访中,TLF 和 MACCE 的发生率分别为 17.4%和 20%。然而,MCT 组的 TLF 发生率明显高于 DKC 组,主要是由于 TLR 更频繁。