Suppr超能文献

药物-抗体偶联物 enfortumab-vedotin 和 sacituzumab-govitecan 在癌症靶向治疗中的副作用。

Side effects of drug-antibody conjugates enfortumab-vedotin and sacituzumab-govitecan in targeted therapy in cancer.

机构信息

Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany.

Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol. 2024 Jun;90:102574. doi: 10.1016/j.canep.2024.102574. Epub 2024 Apr 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADC), enfortumab-vedotin (EV) and sacituzumab-govitecan are new drugs in the treatment of urologic tumors, whose safety profile has not been fully investigated. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate adverse events related to both agents reported to VigiBase, the World Health Organization's global pharmacovigilance database.

METHODS

We employed Bayesian disproportionality analysis based on the information component (IC) to explore the safety profile associated with both therapies. Additionally, we used the proportional reporting ratio approach to examine the safety profile further.

RESULTS

We identified 41,752 reports connected to ADC therapy (EV: n=5359; SG: n=36,393). In the EV subgroup, most reports were associated with dermatologic (38.6%), neurologic adverse events (16.5%), or adverse laboratory assessments (19.4%). In contrast, reports in the SG subgroup were mainly associated with gastrointestinal adverse events (24.2%) and adverse laboratory assessments (39.0%). Adverse laboratory assessments in both cohorts were often based on haematotoxic adverse events.

CONCLUSION

We could provide a comprehensive real-world safety profile of EV and SG using a global pharmacovigilance database. Based on the safety signals explored in this study, further research regarding the impact of these side effects on patient outcomes is justified.

摘要

目的

抗体药物偶联物(ADC)依维莫司单抗-贝妥珠单抗(EV)和Sacituzumab govitecan 是治疗泌尿系统肿瘤的新药,其安全性尚未得到充分研究。因此,我们的研究目的是评估报告给世界卫生组织全球药物警戒数据库 VigiBase 的与这两种药物相关的不良事件。

方法

我们采用基于信息成分(IC)的贝叶斯比例失衡分析来探索与这两种治疗方法相关的安全性概况。此外,我们还使用比例报告比方法进一步检查安全性概况。

结果

我们确定了与 ADC 治疗相关的 41752 份报告(EV:n=5359;SG:n=36393)。在 EV 亚组中,大多数报告与皮肤不良事件(38.6%)、神经不良事件(16.5%)或不良实验室评估(19.4%)有关。相比之下,SG 亚组的报告主要与胃肠道不良事件(24.2%)和不良实验室评估(39.0%)有关。这两个队列的不良实验室评估通常基于血液毒性不良事件。

结论

我们可以使用全球药物警戒数据库提供 EV 和 SG 的全面真实世界安全性概况。基于本研究中探索的安全性信号,有理由进一步研究这些副作用对患者结局的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验