Han Shun, Zhang Ze-Yang, Zhou Ke, Yin Gui-Kun, Liu Yu-Chen, Wang Ben-Jie, Wen Zhun
Department of Orthopaedic, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Liaoning Province, Dalian, 116001, P. R. China.
Department of Orthopaedic, Central Hospital of Zhuanghe City, Zhuanghe, 116400, P. R. China.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Apr 24;19(1):262. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04649-4.
Femoral neck fractures (FNFs) in young adults are usually caused by high-energy trauma, and their treatment remains a challenging issue for orthopedic surgeons. The quality of reduction is considered an important factor in improving the poor prognosis of patients with FNFs. In recent years, positive buttress closed reduction technique has received widespread attention in the treatment of FNFs. This comprehensive literature review is designed to encapsulate the impacts of both non-anatomic and anatomic reduction on the biomechanical stability, clinical outcomes, and postoperative complications in the management of FNFs, conjecture the efficacy of positively braced reduction techniques and provide a thorough summarization of the clinical outcomes.
In this literature review, we have examined all clinical and biomechanical studies related to the treatment of FNFs using non-anatomical reduction or positive and negative buttress reduction. PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar and Embase Library databases were searched systematically for studies published before September 1, 2023. Published literature on fracture reduction techniques for treating FNFs was reviewed. In addition, we evaluated the included literature using the MINORs tool.
Although the "arch bridge" structure formed by the positive buttress reduction technique improved the support to the cortical bone and provided a more stable biomechanical structure, no significant differences were noted in the clinical efficacy and incidence of postoperative complications between the positive buttress reduction and anatomical reduction.
Positive buttress reduction is an effective treatment method for young patients with FNFs. When facing difficult-to-reduce FNF, positive buttress reduction should be considered first, followed by anatomical reduction. However, negative buttress reduction should be avoided.
年轻成人的股骨颈骨折(FNFs)通常由高能量创伤引起,其治疗对骨科医生来说仍然是一个具有挑战性的问题。复位质量被认为是改善FNFs患者不良预后的一个重要因素。近年来,正支撑闭合复位技术在FNFs的治疗中受到广泛关注。本综合文献综述旨在总结非解剖复位和解剖复位对FNFs治疗中生物力学稳定性、临床结果及术后并发症的影响,推测正支撑复位技术的疗效,并对临床结果进行全面总结。
在本文献综述中,我们研究了所有与使用非解剖复位或正、负支撑复位治疗FNFs相关的临床和生物力学研究。系统检索了PubMed、Web of Science、谷歌学术和Embase图书馆数据库中截至2023年9月1日发表的研究。对已发表的关于治疗FNFs的骨折复位技术的文献进行了综述。此外,我们使用MINORs工具评估纳入的文献。
尽管正支撑复位技术形成的“拱桥”结构改善了对皮质骨的支撑并提供了更稳定的生物力学结构,但正支撑复位与解剖复位在临床疗效和术后并发症发生率方面并无显著差异。
正支撑复位是治疗年轻FNFs患者的一种有效治疗方法。面对难以复位的FNF时,应首先考虑正支撑复位,其次是解剖复位。然而,应避免负支撑复位。