Suppr超能文献

针对革兰氏阴性菌的抗生素治疗医院获得性肺炎的疗效与安全性:一项系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析

Efficacy and safety of antibiotics targeting Gram-negative bacteria in nosocomial pneumonia: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Luque Paz David, Chean Dara, Tattevin Pierre, Luque Paz Damien, Bayeh Betsega Assefa, Kouatchet Achille, Douillet Delphine, Riou Jérémie

机构信息

Infectious Diseases and Intensive Care Unit, Pontchaillou Hospital, University Hospital of Rennes, 2, rue Henri Le Guilloux, 35033, Rennes Cedex 9, France.

Inserm U1230, Université de Rennes, Rennes, France.

出版信息

Ann Intensive Care. 2024 Apr 25;14(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13613-024-01291-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple randomized controlled studies have compared numerous antibiotic regimens, including new, recently commercialized antibiotics in the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia (NP). The objective of this Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was to compare the efficacy and the safety of different antibiotic treatments for NP.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases from 2000 through 2021. The study selection included studies comparing antibiotics targeting Gram-negative bacilli in the setting of NP. The primary endpoint was 28 day mortality. Secondary outcomes were clinical cure, microbiological cure and adverse events.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies encompassing 4993 patients were included in this analysis comparing 13 antibiotic regimens. The level of evidence for mortality comparisons ranged from very low to moderate. No significant difference in 28 day mortality was found among all beta-lactam regimens. Only the combination of meropenem plus aerosolized colistin was associated with a significant decrease of mortality compared to using intravenous colistin alone (OR = 0.43; 95% credible interval [0.17-0.94]), based on the results of the smallest trial included. The clinical failure rate of ceftazidime was higher than meropenem with (OR = 1.97; 95% CrI [1.19-3.45]) or without aerosolized colistin (OR = 1.40; 95% CrI [1.00-2.01]), imipemen/cilastatin/relebactam (OR = 1.74; 95% CrI [1.03-2.90]) and ceftazidime/avibactam (OR = 1.48; 95% CrI [1.02-2.20]). For microbiological cure, no substantial difference between regimens was found, but ceftolozane/tazobactam had the highest probability of being superior to comparators. In safety analyses, there was no significant difference between treatments for the occurrence of adverse events, but acute kidney failure was more common in patients receiving intravenous colistin.

CONCLUSIONS

This network meta-analysis suggests that most antibiotic regimens, including new combinations and cefiderocol, have similar efficacy and safety in treating susceptible Gram-negative bacilli in NP. Further studies are necessary for NP caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Registration PROSPERO CRD42021226603.

摘要

背景

多项随机对照研究比较了多种抗生素治疗方案,包括新的、最近商业化的抗生素用于治疗医院获得性肺炎(NP)。这项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析(NMA)的目的是比较不同抗生素治疗NP的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们对2000年至2021年期间的PubMed、Medline、科学网、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库进行了系统检索。研究选择包括在NP背景下比较针对革兰氏阴性杆菌的抗生素的研究。主要终点是28天死亡率。次要结局是临床治愈、微生物学治愈和不良事件。

结果

本分析纳入了16项研究,共4993例患者,比较了13种抗生素治疗方案。死亡率比较的证据水平从极低到中等不等。在所有β-内酰胺类治疗方案中,28天死亡率没有显著差异。根据纳入的最小试验结果,与单独使用静脉注射多粘菌素相比,仅美罗培南加气雾化多粘菌素联合使用与死亡率显著降低相关(OR = 0.43;95%可信区间[0.17 - 0.94])。头孢他啶的临床失败率高于美罗培南联合(OR = 1.97;95% CrI [1.19 - 3.45])或不联合气雾化多粘菌素(OR = 1.40;95% CrI [1.00 - 2.01])、亚胺培南/西司他丁/瑞来巴坦(OR = 1.74;95% CrI [1.03 - 2.90])和头孢他啶/阿维巴坦(OR = 1.48;95% CrI [1.02 - 2.20])。对于微生物学治愈,各治疗方案之间未发现实质性差异,但头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦优于对照方案的可能性最高。在安全性分析中,治疗组之间不良事件的发生没有显著差异,但急性肾衰竭在接受静脉注射多粘菌素的患者中更常见。

结论

这项网络荟萃分析表明,大多数抗生素治疗方案,包括新的联合用药和头孢地尔,在治疗NP中对敏感革兰氏阴性杆菌具有相似的疗效和安全性。对于由多重耐药菌引起的NP,还需要进一步研究。注册PROSPERO CRD42021226603。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5eb8/11045692/38e5f41a7a52/13613_2024_1291_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验