School of Biomedical Engineering & State Key Laboratory of Advanced Medical Materials and Devices & Shanghai Clinical Research and Trial Center, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Radiology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
Radiol Med. 2024 Jun;129(6):834-844. doi: 10.1007/s11547-024-01819-6. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
To study the capability of diffusion-relaxation correlation spectroscopic imaging (DR-CSI) on subtype classification and grade differentiation for small renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Histogram analysis for apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was studied for comparison.
A total of 61 patients with small RCC (< 4 cm) were included in the retrospective study. MRI data were reviewed, including a multi-b (0-1500 s/mm) multi-TE (51-200 ms) diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) sequence. Region of interest (ROI) was delineated manually on DWI to include solid tumor. For each patient, a D-T2 spectrum was fitted and segmented into 5 compartments, and the volume fractions V, V, V, V, V were obtained. ADC mapping was calculated, and histogram parameters ADC 90th, 10th, median, standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis were obtained. All MRI metrices were compared between clear cell RCC (ccRCC) and non-ccRCC group, and between high-grade and low-grade group. Receiver operator curve analysis was used to assess the corresponding diagnostic performance.
Significantly higher ADC 90th, ADC 10th and ADC median, and significantly lower DR-CSI V was found for ccRCC compared to non-ccRCC. Significantly lower ADC 90th, ADC median and significantly higher V was found for high-grade RCC compared to low-grade. For identifying ccRCC from non-ccRCC, V showed the highest area under curve (AUC, 0.861) and specificity (0.882). For differentiating high- from low-grade, ADC 90th showed the highest AUC (0.726) and specificity (0.786), while V also displayed a moderate AUC (0.715).
DR-CSI may offer improved accuracy in subtype identification for small RCC, while do not show better performance for small RCC grading compared to ADC histogram.
研究扩散弛豫相关成像(DR-CSI)在小肾细胞癌(RCC)亚型分类和分级中的能力。比较了表观扩散系数(ADC)的直方图分析。
本回顾性研究共纳入 61 例小 RCC(<4cm)患者。回顾性分析 MRI 资料,包括多 b 值(0-1500 s/mm)多 TE(51-200 ms)扩散加权成像(DWI)序列。在 DWI 上手动勾画 ROI 以包括实体肿瘤。对于每个患者,对 D-T2 谱进行拟合并分为 5 个隔室,获得体积分数 V、V、V、V 和 V。计算 ADC 图,并获得 ADC 第 90 百分位数、第 10 百分位数、中位数、标准差、偏度和峰度的直方图参数。比较 ccRCC 与非 ccRCC 组、高低级别组之间的所有 MRI 指标。采用受试者工作特征曲线分析评估相应的诊断性能。
ccRCC 的 ADC 第 90 百分位数、ADC 第 10 百分位数和 ADC 中位数明显高于非 ccRCC,而 DR-CSI 的 V 明显低于非 ccRCC。高级别 RCC 的 ADC 第 90 百分位数、ADC 中位数明显低于低级别,而 V 明显高于低级别。V 用于识别 ccRCC 与非 ccRCC,曲线下面积(AUC)最高(0.861),特异性最高(0.882)。用于区分高级别与低级别,ADC 第 90 百分位数的 AUC 最高(0.726)和特异性(0.786)最高,而 V 也显示出中等 AUC(0.715)。
DR-CSI 可能为小 RCC 的亚型识别提供更高的准确性,而与 ADC 直方图相比,在小 RCC 分级方面表现不佳。