Doub Thomas W, Hickson Gerald B, Casey Virginia F, McHugh Damian F, Nonken Peter, Catron Thomas F, Domenico Henry J, Pichert James W, Cooper William O
Center for Patient and Professional Advocacy, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
OrthoCarolina, Charlotte, North Carolina.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 Jul 17;106(14):1286-1292. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.00973. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
High reliability in health care requires a balance between intentionally designed systems and individual professional accountability. One element of accountability includes a process for addressing clinicians whose practices are associated with a disproportionate share of patient complaints. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the Patient Advocacy Reporting System (PARS), a tiered intervention model to reduce patient complaints about clinicians.
A retrospective cohort study was conducted involving a southeastern U.S. orthopaedic group practice. The study assessed the implementation of the PARS program and subsequent malpractice claims from 2004 to 2020.
The implementation of PARS was associated with an 83% reduction in malpractice claims cost per high-risk clinician after intervention (p = 0.05; Wilcoxon rank sum test). The overall practice group experienced an 87% reduction in mean annual claims cost per clinician (p = 0.007; segmented regression). The successful adoption required essential elements such as PARS champions, peer messengers, an Office of Patient Affairs, and a clear statement of practice values and professionalism expectations at the time of onboarding.
The PARS program was successfully adopted within a surgical specialty group as a part of ongoing risk prevention and management efforts. The period following PARS was associated with a retrospectively measured reduction in malpractice claim costs. The PARS program can be effectively implemented in a large, single-specialty orthopaedic practice setting and, although not necessarily causal, was, in our case, associated with a period of reduced malpractice claim costs.
We have learned in previous research that there are clear links between professionalism and patient outcomes (e.g., surgical complications), but agree that the focus here on medical malpractice is not directly clinical.
医疗保健中的高可靠性要求在精心设计的系统与个人专业责任之间取得平衡。责任的一个要素包括处理那些其医疗行为引发大量患者投诉的临床医生的流程。本研究旨在评估患者维权报告系统(PARS)的影响,这是一种分层干预模式,用于减少患者对临床医生的投诉。
进行了一项回顾性队列研究,涉及美国东南部的一个骨科集团诊所。该研究评估了2004年至2020年PARS项目的实施情况以及随后的医疗事故索赔。
PARS的实施与干预后每位高风险临床医生的医疗事故索赔成本降低83%相关(p = 0.05;Wilcoxon秩和检验)。整个诊所团队中每位临床医生的年均索赔成本降低了87%(p = 0.007;分段回归)。成功采用该系统需要一些关键要素,如PARS倡导者、同行信使、患者事务办公室,以及在入职时明确的医疗行为价值观和专业素养期望声明。
PARS项目作为正在进行的风险预防和管理工作的一部分,在一个外科专业团队中成功采用。PARS实施后的时期与医疗事故索赔成本的回顾性降低相关。PARS项目可以在大型单一专业骨科诊所环境中有效实施,并且在我们的案例中,尽管不一定具有因果关系,但与医疗事故索赔成本降低的时期相关。
我们在之前的研究中了解到专业素养与患者预后(如手术并发症)之间存在明确联系,但同意这里对医疗事故的关注并非直接的临床问题。