Department of Physiotherapy, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Metro North Health, Brisbane, Australia.
School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences: Physiotherapy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Kenneth G Jamieson Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2024 Jun;71:102961. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2024.102961. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
Previous literature has reported the successful implementation of the Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D®) program into predominantly private practice settings. There may be unique challenges present within the public hospital setting that influence GLA:D® implementation in public health.
Explore the attitudes and experiences of service providers directly involved in implementing GLA:D® in Australian public tertiary hospitals.
Qualitative descriptive study design.
Service providers (n = 14) from three participating hospitals took part in semi-structured focus groups at the completion of the 6-month implementation period. Inductive thematic analysis was employed to identify primary domains across all facilities.
Four broad domains were identified. Factors that influenced uptake included GLA:D® being a recognisable, evidence-based product requiring minimal development or adaptation. The fidelity of the GLA:D® Australia program was challenged by referral of patients with multiple/complex medical comorbidities, and patient preference to complete registry data via paper rather than online. Several operational considerations are required when delivering GLA:D® in a public hospital setting, including adequate numbers of GLA:D®-trained staff, additional screening requirements, obtaining appropriate clinical space, and persisting patient barriers to attending the service. GLA:D® provided benefits beyond improvement in pain and function, including social interactivity, high attendance and promotion of long-term self-management, while also maximising service efficiencies.
Implementing GLA:D® in Australian public hospitals was supported by service providers. Specific operational and administrative factors, including staff training, patient complexity, and registry requirements should be considered when attempting to embed and sustain GLA:D® in large Australian public tertiary hospitals.
先前的文献报道了丹麦(GLA:D®)成功实施“骨性关节炎美好生活”计划,该计划主要在私人诊所实施。在公立医院环境中,可能存在影响公共卫生中 GLA:D®实施的独特挑战。
探讨直接参与澳大利亚公立三级医院实施 GLA:D®的服务提供者的态度和经验。
定性描述性研究设计。
在实施 6 个月结束时,来自三家参与医院的 14 名服务提供者参加了半结构式焦点小组。采用归纳主题分析方法识别所有设施的主要领域。
确定了四个广泛的领域。影响采用的因素包括 GLA:D®是一种公认的、基于证据的产品,只需进行最小的开发或调整。GLA:D®澳大利亚项目的保真度受到患者有多种/复杂合并症转诊的挑战,以及患者偏好通过纸质而不是在线完成登记数据的影响。在公立医院环境中提供 GLA:D®时需要考虑一些运营方面的考虑因素,包括有足够数量的经过 GLA:D®培训的工作人员、额外的筛选要求、获得适当的临床空间以及持续存在的患者就诊障碍。GLA:D®提供的益处不仅在于改善疼痛和功能,还包括社交互动、高出勤率和促进长期自我管理,同时还最大限度地提高了服务效率。
澳大利亚公立医院的服务提供者支持实施 GLA:D®。在试图将 GLA:D®嵌入和维持在澳大利亚大型公立三级医院时,应考虑特定的运营和行政因素,包括员工培训、患者复杂性和登记要求。