Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), School of Dentistry, Araçatuba, São Paulo, Brazil.
Health Sciences Center, Unisagrado, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2024 Sep;36(9):1326-1336. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13237. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
This study aimed to assess the influence of translucent monolithic versus bilayered crowns and whether the use of a CoCr base abutments affects the fatigue and fracture resistance of screwed implant-supported single crowns with external connections under mechanical cycling.
Fifty specimens were divided into groups: (1) metal-ceramic (MC) crown, (2) veneered zirconia crown (Zr), (3) veneered zirconia crown with a CoCr base abutment (ZrB), (4) monolithic translucent zirconia crown (MZr), and (5) monolithic translucent zirconia crown with a CoCr base abutment (MZrB). Specimens underwent mechanical cycling (5 × 10 cycles; 150 N) evaluating fatigue resistance (number of failures) and those that failed were subsequently subjected to fractographic analyses (stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope) to evaluate failure location and area, and maximum fracture load was also measured.
The failure-related survival rate (100%) and maximum fracture resistance of the MZrB were significantly higher than those of MC and Zr (50%; p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the failure rate and fracture resistance when a CoCr base abutment was used or not in the translucent monolithic Zr groups (p > 0.05;MZrB vs. MZr). Failure location, with MC crowns' fractures, noted at the screw area (p = 0.043), while all-ceramic crowns were mostly in the cuspid and to failure area, the Zr group had the largest mean (15.55 ± 9.17 mm) among the groups, significant difference only when compared with MC (1.62 ± 0.81 mm) (p = 0.025).
Translucent monolithic zirconia crowns exhibited significantly higher fatigue and fracture resistance compared with conventional MC and bilayered crowns.
The appropriate choice of material and manufacturing technique is crucial for predicting the higher clinical performance of single crowns. Enhanced mechanical resistance in terms of fatigue and fracture resistance can be achieved by replacing MC and bilayered restorations with computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing monolithic zirconia.
本研究旨在评估半透明整体式与双层冠的影响,以及使用 CoCr 基底基台是否会影响带外连接的螺丝固位种植体单冠的疲劳和断裂阻力。
将 50 个样本分为以下几组:(1)金属陶瓷(MC)冠,(2)饰面氧化锆冠(Zr),(3)带 CoCr 基底基台的饰面氧化锆冠(ZrB),(4)半透明整体氧化锆冠(MZr),和(5)带 CoCr 基底基台的半透明整体氧化锆冠(MZrB)。样本经过机械循环(5×10 次循环;150 N)评估疲劳阻力(故障次数),然后对故障样本进行断口分析(立体显微镜和扫描电子显微镜),以评估故障位置和区域,并测量最大断裂负载。
MZrB 的故障相关存活率(100%)和最大断裂阻力明显高于 MC 和 Zr (50%;p<0.05)。在半透明整体氧化锆组中使用或不使用 CoCr 基底基台时,故障发生率和断裂阻力无显著差异(p>0.05;MZrB 与 MZr)。MC 冠的断裂发生在螺丝区域,故障位置有显著差异(p=0.043),而全瓷冠的断裂大多发生在尖牙和失效区域,Zr 组的平均断裂区域最大(15.55±9.17 mm),与 MC 组相比有显著差异(1.62±0.81 mm)(p=0.025)。
半透明整体氧化锆冠的疲劳和断裂阻力明显高于传统的 MC 和双层冠。
适当选择材料和制造技术对于预测单冠的更高临床性能至关重要。通过用计算机辅助设计和计算机辅助制造的整体氧化锆替代 MC 和双层修复体,可以获得更高的机械疲劳和断裂阻力。