Suppr超能文献

氧化锆陶瓷和金属陶瓷后牙悬臂固定局部义齿的初始损伤和失效载荷。

Initial damage and failure load of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures.

机构信息

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Hospital Heidelberg, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.

Hansezahn Zahnarztpraxen, Rodigallee 250, 22043, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Jan 15;28(1):94. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05501-z.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare failure load and initial damage in monolithic, partially veneered, and completely veneered (translucent) zirconia cantilevered fixed partial dentures (CFPDs), as well as completely veneered metal-ceramic CFPDs under different support and loading configurations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eight test groups with anatomically congruent CFPDs (n = 8/group) were fabricated, differing in CFPD material/support structure/loading direction (load applied via steel ball (Ø 6 mm) 3 mm from the distal end of the pontic for axial loading with a 2-point contact on the inner cusp ridges of the buccal and oral cusps and 1.3 mm below the oral cusp tip for 30° oblique loading): (1) monolithic zirconia/CoCr abutment teeth/axial, (2) monolithic zirconia/CoCr abutment teeth/oblique, (3) partially veneered zirconia/CoCr abutment teeth/axial, (4) partially veneered zirconia/CoCr abutment teeth/oblique, (5) completely veneered zirconia/CoCr abutment teeth/axial, (6) completely veneered CoCr/CoCr abutment teeth/axial (control group), (7) partially veneered zirconia/implants/axial, and (8) partially veneered zirconia/natural teeth/axial. Restorations were artificially aged before failure testing. Statistical analysis was conducted using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests.

RESULTS

Mean failure loads ranged from 392 N (group 8) to 1181 N (group 1). Axially loaded monolithic zirconia CFPDs (group 1) and controls (group 6) showed significantly higher failure loads. Oblique loading significantly reduced failure loads for monolithic zirconia CFPDs (group 2). Initial damage was observed in all groups except monolithic zirconia groups, and fractography revealed design flaws (sharp edges at the occlusal boundary of the veneering window) in partially veneered zirconia CFPDs.

CONCLUSIONS

Monolithic zirconia CFPDs might be a viable alternative to completely veneered CoCr CFPDs in terms of fracture load. However, oblique loading of monolithic zirconia CFPDs should be avoided in clinical scenarios. Design improvements are required for partially veneered zirconia CFPDs to enhance their load-bearing capacity.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Monolithic zirconia may represent a viable all-ceramic alternative to the established metal-ceramic option for CFPD fabrication. However, in daily clinical practice, careful occlusal adjustment and regular monitoring should ensure that oblique loading of the cantilever is avoided.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较整体式、部分贴面式和完全贴面式(半透明)氧化锆悬臂式固定局部义齿(CFPD)以及完全贴面式金属陶瓷 CFPD 在不同的支持和加载配置下的失效负载和初始损伤。

材料和方法

制作了 8 个具有解剖一致性的 CFPD 测试组(每组 n = 8),CFPD 材料/支撑结构/加载方向不同(通过距桥体末端 3mm 的钢球(Ø 6mm)施加负载,在颊侧和口腔侧牙尖的内牙尖嵴上进行 2 点接触,在口腔牙尖尖端下方 1.3mm 处进行 30°斜向加载):(1)整体氧化锆/CoCr 基牙/轴向,(2)整体氧化锆/CoCr 基牙/斜向,(3)部分贴面氧化锆/CoCr 基牙/轴向,(4)部分贴面氧化锆/CoCr 基牙/斜向,(5)完全贴面氧化锆/CoCr 基牙/轴向,(6)完全贴面 CoCr/CoCr 基牙/轴向(对照组),(7)部分贴面氧化锆/种植体/轴向,和(8)部分贴面氧化锆/天然牙/轴向。在失效测试前,对修复体进行人工老化。使用单因素方差分析和 Tukey 事后检验进行统计分析。

结果

平均失效负载范围为 392N(组 8)至 1181N(组 1)。轴向加载的整体氧化锆 CFPD(组 1)和对照组(组 6)表现出更高的失效负载。斜向加载显著降低了整体氧化锆 CFPD(组 2)的失效负载。除了整体氧化锆组外,所有组均观察到初始损伤,断口分析显示部分贴面氧化锆 CFPD 存在设计缺陷(贴面窗的牙合边界处有尖锐边缘)。

结论

在断裂负载方面,整体氧化锆 CFPD 可能是完全贴面 CoCr CFPD 的一种可行替代方案。然而,在临床情况下应避免斜向加载整体氧化锆 CFPD。需要改进部分贴面氧化锆 CFPD 的设计,以提高其承载能力。

临床意义

整体氧化锆可能是 CFPD 制作中替代传统金属陶瓷的一种可行的全陶瓷选择。然而,在日常临床实践中,应仔细调整咬合,并定期监测,以确保避免悬臂的斜向加载。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/733e/10788321/db57ae5a7eea/784_2024_5501_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验