Crochemore Tomaz, Scarlatescu Ecaterina, Görlinger Klaus, Rocha Marcia Del Piccolo, Carlos de Campos Guerra João, Campêlo Dirceu Hamilton Cordeiro, de Aranda Valdir Fernandes, Ricardi Lucélia, Gomes Glaucia Santana, Moura Raquel Alves de, Assir Fernanda Ferraz, de Sá Gabriela Rodrigues Rocco, Lance Marcus D, Hamerschlak Nelson
Intensive Care Department, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Intensive Care Department, Hospital Moriah, São Paulo, Brazil.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024 Mar 1;8(2):102362. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102362. eCollection 2024 Feb.
Patients with hematological malignancies (HM) frequently present thrombocytopenia and higher risk of bleeding. Although transfusion is associated with higher risk of adverse events and poor outcomes, prophylactic transfusion of platelets is a common practice to prevent hemorrhagic complications. Thromboelastometry has been considered a better predictor for bleeding than isolated platelet counts in different settings. In early stages of sepsis, hypercoagulability may occur due to higher fibrinogen levels.
To evaluate the behavior of coagulation in patients with HM who develop sepsis and to verify whether a higher concentration of fibrinogen is associated with a proportional increase in maximum clot firmness (MCF) even in the presence of severe thrombocytopenia.
We performed a unicentric analytical cross-sectional study with 60 adult patients with HM and severe thrombocytopenia, of whom 30 had sepsis (sepsis group) and 30 had no infections (control group). Coagulation conventional tests and specific coagulation tests, including thromboelastometry, were performed. The main outcome evaluated was MCF.
Higher levels of fibrinogen and MCF were found in sepsis group. Both fibrinogen and platelets contributed to MCF. The relative contribution of fibrin was significantly higher (60.5 ± 12.8% vs 43.6 ± 9.7%; < .001) and that of platelets was significantly lower (39.5 ± 12.8% vs 56.4 ± 9.7%; < .001) in the sepsis group compared with the control group.
Patients with sepsis and HM presented higher concentrations of fibrinogen than uninfected patients, resulting in greater MCF amplitudes even in the presence of thrombocytopenia.
血液系统恶性肿瘤(HM)患者常出现血小板减少症且出血风险较高。尽管输血与不良事件风险增加及预后不良相关,但预防性输注血小板仍是预防出血并发症的常见做法。在不同情况下,血栓弹力图被认为比单纯血小板计数更能预测出血情况。在脓毒症早期,由于纤维蛋白原水平升高可能会出现高凝状态。
评估发生脓毒症的HM患者的凝血情况,并验证即使在严重血小板减少的情况下,较高浓度的纤维蛋白原是否与最大血凝块硬度(MCF)成比例增加相关。
我们对60例患有HM和严重血小板减少症的成年患者进行了一项单中心分析性横断面研究,其中30例患有脓毒症(脓毒症组),30例无感染(对照组)。进行了凝血常规检查和包括血栓弹力图在内的特定凝血检查。评估的主要结果是MCF。
脓毒症组的纤维蛋白原水平和MCF较高。纤维蛋白原和血小板均对MCF有贡献。与对照组相比,脓毒症组纤维蛋白的相对贡献显著更高(60.5±12.8%对43.6±9.7%;<0.001),而血小板的相对贡献显著更低(39.5±12.8%对56.4±9.7%;<0.001)。
与未感染患者相比,患有脓毒症和HM的患者纤维蛋白原浓度更高,即使存在血小板减少症,也会导致更大的MCF幅度。