van Linschoten Reinier C A, van der Woude C Janneke, Visser Elyke, van Leeuwen Nikki, Bodelier Alexander G L, Fitzpatrick Claire, de Jonge Vincent, Vermeulen Hestia, Verweij K Evelyne, van der Wiel Sanne, Nieboer Daan, Birnie Erwin, van der Horst Daniëlle, Hazelzet Jan A, van Noord Desirée, West Rachel L
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2025 Feb 6;31(2):332-343. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izae095.
Data on variation in outcomes and costs of the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can be used to identify areas for cost and quality improvement. It can also help healthcare providers learn from each other and strive for equity in care. We aimed to assess the variation in outcomes and costs of IBD care between hospitals.
We conducted a 12-month cohort study in 8 hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients with IBD who were treated with biologics and new small molecules were included. The percentage of variation in outcomes (following the International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement standard set) and costs attributable to the treating hospital were analyzed with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) from case mix-adjusted (generalized) linear mixed models.
We included 1010 patients (median age 45 years, 55% female). Clinicians reported high remission rates (83%), while patient-reported rates were lower (40%). During the 12-month follow-up, 5.2% of patients used prednisolone for more than 3 months. Hospital costs (outpatient, inpatient, and medication costs) were substantial (median: €8323 per 6 months), mainly attributed to advanced therapies (€6611). Most of the variation in outcomes and costs among patients could not be attributed to the treating hospitals, with ICCs typically between 0% and 2%. Instead, patient-level characteristics, often with ICCs above 50%, accounted for these variations.
Variation in outcomes and costs cannot be used to differentiate between hospitals for quality of care. Future quality improvement initiatives should look at differences in structure and process measures of care and implement patient-level interventions to improve quality of IBD care.
NL8276.
炎症性肠病(IBD)治疗结果和成本的差异数据可用于确定成本和质量改进的领域。它还可以帮助医疗保健提供者相互学习,并努力实现医疗公平。我们旨在评估医院之间IBD护理结果和成本的差异。
我们在荷兰的8家医院进行了一项为期12个月的队列研究。纳入接受生物制剂和新型小分子治疗的IBD患者。采用病例组合调整(广义)线性混合模型的组内相关系数(ICC)分析治疗医院导致的结果差异百分比(遵循国际健康结果测量联盟设定的标准)和成本差异。
我们纳入了1010名患者(中位年龄45岁,55%为女性)。临床医生报告的缓解率较高(83%),而患者报告的缓解率较低(40%)。在12个月的随访期间,5.2%的患者使用泼尼松龙超过3个月。医院成本(门诊、住院和药物成本)很高(中位数:每6个月8323欧元),主要归因于先进疗法(6611欧元)。患者之间的大多数结果和成本差异不能归因于治疗医院,ICC通常在0%至2%之间。相反,患者层面的特征通常ICC高于50%,是造成这些差异的原因。
结果和成本的差异不能用于区分医院的医疗质量。未来的质量改进举措应关注护理结构和过程措施的差异,并实施患者层面的干预措施以提高IBD护理质量。
NL8276。