Department of Surgery.
Centre Intégré Universitaire de, Santé et de Services Sociaux de l'Estrie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CIUSSSE - CHUS), Quebec, Canada.
Int J Surg. 2024 Jun 1;110(6):3392-3400. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001458.
The use of autologous blood transfusions in oncologic surgeries is somewhat controversial due to the potential risk of disease dissemination through the salvage process. On the other hand, autologous blood transfusion can prevent the potential negative effects of allogenic blood transfusions and reduce use of valuable resources.
This study included 106 adult patients who underwent oncologic liver surgery at our institution between December 2015 and June 2019. The patients were divided into two groups: the Cell Saver group (operated between January 2018 and June 2019) and the control group (operated between December 2015 and December 2017). The Cell Saver device was present in the operating room for the Cell Saver group, and blood was retransfused if a certain amount of blood loss occurred. Data analysis focused on outcomes such as blood transfusion requirements, overall survival, recurrence-free survival, hemoglobin levels, hospital stay, and complications. Patient records provided relevant information on demographics, surgery details, pathology, and outcomes for both groups.
Autologous blood transfusion was found to reduce the amount of blood units needed (4.0 units (control group) versus 0.4 units (Cell Saver group) P =0.029. Kaplan-Meier curves showed no difference for both overall survival 471.6 days (Cell Saver group) versus 468.3 days (control group) ( P =0.219) and 488.9 days (Cell Saver group) versus 487.2 days (control group) ( P =0.993) and disease-free survival ( P =0.553) and ( P =0.735) for primary hepatic tumors and hepatic metastasis respectively between the Cell Saver and control groups. Overall survival regardless of the type of tumor was similar to the control group (485.4 days vs. 481.9 days) ( P =0.503). Survival was significantly lower for minor hepatectomies (516.0 days vs. 517.4 days) ( P =0.050) in the Cell Saver group, major hepatectomies showed no difference in overall survival (470.2 days vs. 466.4 days) ( P =0.868). No impact on disease recurrence was found between patients who received autologous blood transfusions versus those who did not.
The use of Cell Saver should not be avoided in oncologic surgeries of the liver. Use of Cell Saver for major hepatectomies might be more beneficial as OS was significantly lower for the Cell Saver group for patients who underwent minor hepactomies. Further research is needed to explain this conflicting result. Nonetheless, the use of Cell Saver in autologous blood transfusions can reduce the use of valuable resources and the risks associated with allogenic blood transfusions.
由于在 salvage 过程中存在疾病传播的潜在风险,肿瘤手术中使用自体输血存在一定争议。另一方面,自体输血可以预防同种异体输血的潜在负面影响,并减少宝贵资源的使用。
本研究纳入了 2015 年 12 月至 2019 年 6 月期间在我院接受肿瘤肝切除术的 106 例成年患者。患者分为两组:Cell Saver 组(2018 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月手术)和对照组(2015 年 12 月至 2017 年 12 月手术)。Cell Saver 组手术室配备 Cell Saver 设备,如果发生一定量的失血,则进行血液再输血。数据分析重点关注输血需求、总生存率、无复发生存率、血红蛋白水平、住院时间和并发症等结果。患者记录提供了两组患者的人口统计学、手术细节、病理学和结果的相关信息。
发现自体输血可减少所需血单位数量(对照组 4.0 单位,Cell Saver 组 0.4 单位,P=0.029)。Kaplan-Meier 曲线显示两组总生存率无差异,Cell Saver 组为 471.6 天,对照组为 468.3 天(P=0.219),Cell Saver 组为 488.9 天,对照组为 487.2 天(P=0.993),无病生存率(原发性肝肿瘤和肝转移)分别为 Cell Saver 组和对照组(P=0.553)和(P=0.735)。无论肿瘤类型如何,Cell Saver 组的总生存率与对照组相似(485.4 天比 481.9 天)(P=0.503)。Cell Saver 组小肝切除术的生存率显著降低(516.0 天比 517.4 天)(P=0.050),大肝切除术的总生存率无差异(470.2 天比 466.4 天)(P=0.868)。在接受自体输血的患者和未接受自体输血的患者之间,未发现疾病复发有任何影响。
Cell Saver 不应避免用于肝肿瘤手术。对于大肝切除术,使用 Cell Saver 可能更有益,因为对于接受小肝切除术的患者,Cell Saver 组的总生存率显著降低。需要进一步研究来解释这一矛盾的结果。尽管如此,自体输血中使用 Cell Saver 可以减少宝贵资源的使用和同种异体输血的相关风险。