Pittyanont Sirida, Suriya Narongwat, Sirilert Sirinart, Tongsong Theera
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Prapokklao Hospital, Chanthaburi 22000, Thailand.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Clin Pract. 2024 Mar 25;14(2):536-545. doi: 10.3390/clinpract14020041.
(1) : The primary objective is to compare the rate of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) between women with diet-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and those with non-GDM, and to assess whether or not diet-controlled GDM is an independent factor of LGA fetuses. The secondary objectives are to compare the rates of other common adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preeclampsia, cesarean section rate, preterm birth, and low Apgar score, between pregnancies with diet-controlled GDM and non-GDM pregnancies. (2) : A retrospective cohort study was conducted on singleton pregnancies, diagnosed with GDM and non-GDM between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation, based on a two-step screening test. The prospective database of the obstetric department was accessed to retrieve the records meeting the inclusion criteria, and full medical records were comprehensively reviewed. The patients were categorized into two groups, GDM (study group) and non-GDM (control group). The main outcome was the rate of LGA newborns, and the secondary outcomes included pregnancy-induced hypertension, preterm birth, cesarean rate, low Apgar scores, etc. (3) : Of 1364 recruited women, 1342 met the inclusion criteria, including 1177 cases in the non-GDM group and 165 (12.3%) in the GDM group. Maternal age and pre-pregnancy BMI were significantly higher in the GDM group. The rates of LGA newborns, PIH, and cesarean section were significantly higher in the GDM group (15.1% vs. 7.1%, -value < 0.001; 7.8% vs. 2.6%, -value = 0.004; and 54.5% vs. 41.5%, -value = 0.002; respectively). On logistic regression analysis, GDM was not significantly associated with LGA (odds ratio 1.64, 95% CI: 0.97-2.77), while BMI and gender were still significantly associated with LGA. Likewise, GDM was not significantly associated with the rate of PIH (odds ratio: 1.7, 95% CI: 0.825-3.504), while BMI and maternal age were significantly associated with PIH, after controlling confounding factors. (4) : The rates of LGA newborns, PIH, and cesarean section are significantly higher in women with diet-controlled GDM than those with non-GDM. Nevertheless, the rates of LGA newborns and PIH are not directly caused by GDM but mainly caused high pre-pregnancy BMI and advanced maternal age, which are more commonly encountered among women with GDM.
(1):主要目的是比较饮食控制的妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)女性与非GDM女性的大于胎龄儿(LGA)发生率,并评估饮食控制的GDM是否为LGA胎儿的独立因素。次要目的是比较饮食控制的GDM妊娠与非GDM妊娠之间其他常见不良妊娠结局的发生率,如子痫前期、剖宫产率、早产和低Apgar评分。(2):基于两步筛查试验,对妊娠24至28周期间诊断为GDM和非GDM的单胎妊娠进行了一项回顾性队列研究。访问产科的前瞻性数据库以检索符合纳入标准的记录,并对完整的病历进行全面审查。将患者分为两组,GDM(研究组)和非GDM(对照组)。主要结局是LGA新生儿的发生率,次要结局包括妊娠高血压、早产、剖宫产率、低Apgar评分等。(3):在1364名招募的女性中,1342名符合纳入标准,其中非GDM组1177例,GDM组165例(12.3%)。GDM组的产妇年龄和孕前BMI显著更高。GDM组的LGA新生儿、PIH和剖宫产率显著更高(分别为15.1%对7.1%,P值<0.001;7.8%对2.6%,P值=0.004;54.5%对41.5%,P值=0.002)。在逻辑回归分析中,GDM与LGA无显著关联(优势比1.64,95%可信区间:0.97 - 2.77),而BMI和性别仍与LGA显著相关。同样,在控制混杂因素后,GDM与PIH发生率无显著关联(优势比:1.7,95%可信区间:0.825 - 3.504),而BMI和产妇年龄与PIH显著相关。(4):饮食控制的GDM女性的LGA新生儿、PIH和剖宫产率显著高于非GDM女性。然而,LGA新生儿和PIH的发生率并非直接由GDM导致,而是主要由孕前高BMI和高龄产妇引起,这些在GDM女性中更常见。