Ribeiro Neto Frederico, Dos Santos Luiz Gustavo Teixeira Fabrício, Castelli Correia de Campos Luis Felipe, Winckler Ciro, Gomes Costa Rodrigo Rodrigues
SARAH Network of Rehabilitation Hospitals, Paralympic Sports Program, Brasilia, Brazil.
Brazilian Canoe Federation, Paracanoe Supervisor, Curitiba, Brazil.
Percept Mot Skills. 2024 Aug;131(4):1291-1307. doi: 10.1177/00315125241247859. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
Improvements in race times for male and female Para canoe athletes across different sports classes have led to a reduction in relative differences between classes over time. However, there is a lack of research examining the comparative developmental trajectories between high-performance Paralympic (PCS) and Olympic (OCS) canoe sprint. In this study, we compared the developmental trajectories of 200-meter kayak performances among PCS and OCS athletes. In total, we analyzed 628 race results obtained from public online databases, for nine competitions between 2015 and 2023. Race times were reduced over the years except in specific sports classes (KL3-M, K1-M, and K1-F; KL: Kayak Level, M: male, F: female), with a poor positive correlation (r = 0.17 to 0.33) between time and the years. For the remaining sports classes, these correlations ranged from poor to fair (r = -0.58 to -0.13). OCS K1 athletes outperformed their Paralympic counterparts. Among Paralympic classes, KL1 had slower times than KL2 and KL3 ( ≤ .05), with KL2 times significantly lower than KL3 in the female category. OCS athletes exhibited less variability in race times compared to PCS athletes. In the male category, there were no significant differences in the coefficients of variation (CV) and amplitude of race times between sport classes, except for KL1-M, which had a larger CV than K1 ( ≤ .05). In the female category, the CV and amplitude of race times were significantly higher in KL1-F compared to KL3-F and K1-F. OCS times remained stable from 2015, with KL3-M following a similar trend. PCS displayed greater race time variability, particularly in higher impairment classes, notably KL1. This underscores the existence of distinct developmental stages within the canoe sprint modality, particularly emphasizing the early developmental phase of KL1. It also provides valuable insights for coaches and sports selection, especially concerning athletes with more severe impairments, including those in Rehabilitation Centers and during athlete recruitment.
不同运动级别男女残疾人皮划艇运动员比赛成绩的提高,使得随着时间推移各级别之间的相对差异有所减小。然而,目前缺乏对高水平残奥会(PCS)和奥运会(OCS)皮划艇短距离赛比较发展轨迹的研究。在本研究中,我们比较了PCS和OCS运动员200米皮艇比赛成绩的发展轨迹。我们总共分析了从公共在线数据库获取的628场比赛结果,这些比赛是2015年至2023年期间的九场赛事。除了特定运动级别(KL3 - M、K1 - M和K1 - F;KL:皮艇级别,M:男性,F:女性)外,多年来比赛成绩有所下降,时间与年份之间呈较弱的正相关(r = 0.17至0.33)。对于其余运动级别,这些相关性从弱到中等(r = -0.58至 -0.13)。OCS K1运动员的表现优于其残奥会同行。在残奥会级别中,KL1的成绩比KL2和KL3慢(≤.05),在女子组别中KL2的成绩明显低于KL3。与PCS运动员相比,OCS运动员比赛成绩的变异性较小。在男子组别中,除了KL1 - M的变异系数(CV)比K1大(≤.05)外,各运动级别比赛成绩的CV和幅度没有显著差异。在女子组别中,KL1 - F比赛成绩的CV和幅度明显高于KL3 - F和K1 - F。OCS成绩自2015年以来保持稳定,KL3 - M呈现类似趋势。PCS的比赛成绩变异性更大,尤其是在损伤程度较高的级别,特别是KL1。这凸显了皮划艇短距离赛模式中存在不同的发展阶段,尤其强调了KL1的早期发展阶段。它还为教练和运动员选拔提供了有价值的见解,特别是对于包括康复中心的运动员以及运动员招募期间有更严重损伤的运动员。