Suppr超能文献

怀疑心肌梗死合并右束支传导阻滞患者的定量 ST-T 分析的影响。

Impact of Quantitative ST-T Analysis in Patients With Suspected Myocardial Infarction Presenting With Right Bundle Branch Block.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Heart & Vascular Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Hamburg/Kiel/Lübeck, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Cardiology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde, Denmark; Department of Cardiology, The Heart Centre, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Am J Med. 2024 Aug;137(8):770-775.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2024.04.021. Epub 2024 Apr 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While left bundle branch block (LBBB) is a well-known risk feature in patients with acute myocardial infarction, and a rapid invasive management is recommended, data supporting this strategy for patients with right bundle branch block (RBBB) is less robust.

METHODS

In total, 2139 patients with suspected ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) were triaged to acute coronary angiography based on a prehospital 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). Sensitivity and specificity for STEMI-ECG criteria were compared in RBBB and non-BBB patients. Adjusted hazard ratios for 1-year overall mortality were computed.

RESULTS

STEMI was adjudicated in 1832/2139 (85.6%) of all patients and in 102/117 (87.2%) of RBBB patients. ST-segment deviation followed typical ST-T patterns in most RBBB patients. Of 17 RBBB patients without significant ST changes, STEMI was adjudicated in 14 (82%). Diagnostic accuracy of STEMI criteria was comparable in RBBB and non-RBBB patients for inferior (sensitivity: 51.1% vs 59.1%, P = .14; specificity: 66.7% vs 52.1%, P = .33) and anterior STEMI (sensitivity: 35.2% vs 36.6%, P = .80; specificity: 58.3% vs 49.5%, P = .55). Diagnostic performance was lower for lateral STEMI in RBBB patients (sensitivity: 14.8% vs 4.4%, P = .001; specificity: 75.0% vs 98.4%, P < .001). Patients with RBBB had higher 1-year mortality compared with non-BBB patients (hazard ratio 2.3%; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-4.21.

CONCLUSION

ECG criteria used for detection of STEMI showed comparable diagnostic accuracy in RBBB and non-BBB patients. However, STEMI was frequently present in RBBB patients not fulfilling diagnostic ECG criteria. RBBB patients showed poorer outcome after 1 year. Consequently, the presence of RBBB in suspected STEMI cases signifies a high-risk feature, aligning with established guidelines.

摘要

背景

左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)是急性心肌梗死患者的一个众所周知的危险特征,推荐进行快速有创性管理,然而对于右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)患者,支持这种策略的数据则不那么充分。

方法

共有 2139 例疑似 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者根据院前 12 导联心电图(ECG)进行急性冠状动脉造影。比较了 RBBB 和非 RBBB 患者中 STEMI-ECG 标准的敏感性和特异性。计算了 1 年总死亡率的校正风险比。

结果

所有患者中 1832/2139(85.6%)和 102/117(87.2%)患者被诊断为 STEMI。大多数 RBBB 患者的 ST 段偏移遵循典型的 ST-T 模式。在 17 例无明显 ST 改变的 RBBB 患者中,有 14 例(82%)被诊断为 STEMI。STEMI 标准的诊断准确性在 RBBB 和非 RBBB 患者中相似,下壁 STEMI 的敏感性分别为 51.1%和 59.1%(P =.14),特异性分别为 66.7%和 52.1%(P =.33);前壁 STEMI 的敏感性分别为 35.2%和 36.6%(P =.80),特异性分别为 58.3%和 49.5%(P =.55)。在 RBBB 患者中, lateral STEMI 的诊断性能较低,敏感性分别为 14.8%和 4.4%(P =.001),特异性分别为 75.0%和 98.4%(P <.001)。与非 RBBB 患者相比,RBBB 患者 1 年死亡率更高(风险比 2.3%;95%置信区间,1.25-4.21)。

结论

用于检测 STEMI 的 ECG 标准在 RBBB 和非 RBBB 患者中具有相似的诊断准确性。然而,不符合诊断 ECG 标准的 RBBB 患者中,STEMI 经常存在。RBBB 患者在 1 年后的预后较差。因此,怀疑为 STEMI 的病例中存在 RBBB 表示高危特征,与既定指南一致。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验