Suppr超能文献

评估灌注磁共振成像和传统磁共振成像在鉴别复发性脑转移瘤与脑放射性坏死中的效能。

Evaluating the Efficacy of Perfusion MRI and Conventional MRI in Distinguishing Recurrent Cerebral Metastasis from Brain Radiation Necrosis.

作者信息

Schack Anders, Aunan-Diop Jan Saip, Gerhardt Frederik A, Pedersen Christian Bonde, Halle Bo, Kofoed Mikkel S, Markovic Ljubo, Wirenfeldt Martin, Poulsen Frantz Rom

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Odense University Hospital, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark.

Department of Clinical Research, BRIDGE (Brain Research-Inter Disciplinary Guided Excellence), University of Southern Denmark, DK-5230 Odense, Denmark.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2024 Mar 27;14(4):321. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14040321.

Abstract

Differentiating recurrent cerebral metastasis (CM) from brain radiation necrosis (BRN) is pivotal for guiding appropriate treatment and prognostication. Despite advances in imaging techniques, however, accurately distinguishing these conditions non-invasively is still challenging. This single-center retrospective study reviewed 32 cases (28 patients) with confirmed cerebral metastases who underwent surgical excision of lesions initially diagnosed by MRI and/or MR perfusion scans from 1 January 2015 to 30 September 2020. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by comparing imaging findings with postoperative histopathology. Conventional MRI accurately identified recurrent CM in 75% of cases. MR perfusion scans showed significantly higher mean maximum relative cerebral blood volume (max. rCBV) in metastasis cases, indicating its potential as a discriminative biomarker. No single imaging modality could definitively distinguish CM from BRN. Survival analysis revealed gender as the only significant factor affecting overall survival, with no significant survival difference observed between patients with CM and BRN after controlling for confounding factors. This study underscores the limitations of both conventional MRI and MR perfusion scans in differentiating recurrent CM from BRN. Histopathological examination remains essential for accurate diagnosis. Further research is needed to improve the reliability of non-invasive imaging and to guide the management of patients with these post-radiation events.

摘要

鉴别复发性脑转移瘤(CM)和脑放射性坏死(BRN)对于指导恰当的治疗和预后判断至关重要。然而,尽管成像技术有所进步,但通过非侵入性方法准确区分这些病症仍具有挑战性。这项单中心回顾性研究对2015年1月1日至2020年9月30日期间32例(28名患者)经MRI和/或MR灌注扫描初步诊断为脑转移瘤并接受病变手术切除的确诊病例进行了回顾。通过将成像结果与术后组织病理学结果进行比较来评估诊断准确性。传统MRI在75%的病例中准确识别出复发性CM。MR灌注扫描显示转移瘤病例的平均最大相对脑血容量(最大rCBV)显著更高,表明其作为鉴别生物标志物的潜力。没有单一的成像方式能够明确区分CM和BRN。生存分析显示性别是影响总生存的唯一显著因素,在控制混杂因素后,CM患者和BRN患者之间未观察到显著的生存差异。本研究强调了传统MRI和MR灌注扫描在鉴别复发性CM和BRN方面的局限性。组织病理学检查对于准确诊断仍然至关重要。需要进一步研究以提高非侵入性成像的可靠性,并指导这些放疗后事件患者的管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/276a/11048647/a1e6dbf061b6/brainsci-14-00321-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验