Yee Jae-Sung, Choi Jin-Kwan, Kim Ki-Tae, Lee Ho-Won, Lee Yong-Beom
Division of Physical Examination, Gyeonggi Bukbu Regional Office of Military Manpower, Uijeongbu 11642, Republic of Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Anyang 14068, Republic of Korea.
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 14;13(8):2276. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082276.
: Large-to-massive rotator cuff tears (LMRCTs) present challenges in achieving successful repair due to factors such as muscle atrophy and tendon retraction. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) with reinforcement techniques like superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) or patch graft augmentation (PGA) has emerged as a less invasive option to improve shoulder joint stability and prevent retear. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of SCR and PGA as reinforcement techniques for the arthroscopic repair of LMRCTs. : A single-center retrospective study was conducted on patients undergoing LMRCT repair between January 2019 and December 2021. Patients were divided into two groups: those receiving SCR (Group 1) and those receiving PGA (Group 2). Various clinical parameters including range of motion, functional scores, and radiological assessments were evaluated preoperatively and six months postoperatively. : Both SCR and PGA techniques demonstrated significant improvements in the range of motion and clinical scores postoperatively. However, Group 2 showed higher postoperative SST and UCLA scores compared to Group 1. Radiologically, there was a slightly higher retear rate in Group 2, although this was not statistically significant. Group 2 also had a shorter mean duration of surgery compared to Group 1. : In the arthroscopic repair of LMRCTs, both SCR and PGA techniques exhibit favorable clinical and radiological outcomes. Despite the simplicity of PGA compared to SCR, it offers comparable results with a shorter surgical duration, making it a feasible reinforcement option for surgeons.
大型至巨大型肩袖撕裂(LMRCTs)由于肌肉萎缩和肌腱回缩等因素,在实现成功修复方面存在挑战。采用上关节囊重建(SCR)或补片移植增强(PGA)等增强技术的关节镜下肩袖修复(ARCR)已成为一种侵入性较小的选择,以改善肩关节稳定性并防止再次撕裂。本研究旨在比较SCR和PGA作为LMRCTs关节镜修复增强技术的临床和影像学结果。:对2019年1月至2021年12月期间接受LMRCT修复的患者进行了一项单中心回顾性研究。患者分为两组:接受SCR的患者(第1组)和接受PGA的患者(第2组)。术前和术后6个月评估了包括活动范围、功能评分和影像学评估在内的各种临床参数。:SCR和PGA技术术后在活动范围和临床评分方面均有显著改善。然而,与第1组相比,第2组术后SST和UCLA评分更高。在影像学上,第2组的再次撕裂率略高,尽管这在统计学上不显著。与第1组相比,第2组的平均手术时间也更短。:在LMRCTs的关节镜修复中,SCR和PGA技术均显示出良好的临床和影像学结果。尽管PGA与SCR相比操作简单,但它能提供相当的结果,且手术时间更短,使其成为外科医生可行的增强选择。