Barth Johannes, Olmos Manuel Ignacio, Swan John, Barthelemy Renaud, Delsol Philippe, Boutsiadis Achilleas
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Centre Osteoarticulaire des Cèdres, Echirolles, Grenoble, France.
Department of Radiology, Clinique du Mail, Grenoble, France.
Am J Sports Med. 2020 May;48(6):1430-1438. doi: 10.1177/0363546520912220. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
Materials and patches with increased biomechanical and biological properties and superior capsular reconstruction may change the natural history of massive rotator cuff tears (RCTs).
To compare structural and clinical outcomes among 3 surgical techniques for the treatment of massive posterosuperior RCTs: double-row (DR) technique, transosseous-equivalent (TOE) technique with absorbable patch reinforcement, and superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) autograft.
Cohort study; Level of evidence 3.
We retrospectively analyzed the 3 techniques in patients who underwent repair of massive posterosuperior RCTs between January 2007 and March 2017. All patients completed preoperative and 24-month postoperative evaluations: range of motion, subjective shoulder value, Simple Shoulder Test, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, visual analog scale for pain, and Constant score. Tendon integrity was assessed with ultrasound 1 year postoperatively.
A total of 82 patients completed the final evaluation (28 patients, DR; 30 patients, TOE + patch; 24 patients, SCR with LHBT). Groups were statistically comparable preoperatively, except for active forward elevation and tendon retraction, which were significantly worse in the SCR group ( = .008 and = .001, respectively). After 24 months, the mean ± SD scores for the respective groups were as follows: 76 ± 10, 72 ± 15, and 77 ± 10 for the Constant score ( = .35); 84 ± 10, 84 ± 15, and 80 ± 15 for the ASES ( = .61); 9 ± 2, 9 ± 3, and 8 ± 3 for the Simple Shoulder Test ( = .23); 82 ± 15, 80 ± 18, and 75 ± 18 for the subjective shoulder value ( = .29); and 1.4 ± 1.7, 1.8 ± 2, and 1.4 ± 1.4 for the visual analog scale ( = .65). The strength of the operated shoulder was 4 ± 3 kg, 4.7 ± 3 kg, and 6.4 ± 1.6 kg for the DR, TOE + patch, and SCR groups, respectively ( = .006). At 12 months postoperatively, 60.7% (17 of 28) of the DR group, 56.7% (17 of 30) of the TOE + patch group, and 91.7% (22 of 24) of the SCR group remained healed on ultrasound. The infraspinatus tendon remained healed in 75% of the DR group, 76.5% of the TOE + patch group, and 100% of the SCR with the LHBT group ( = .006).
In cases of massive posterosuperior RCTs, SCR with the LHBT should be considered a reliable, cost-effective treatment option that protects infraspinatus integrity.
具有增强的生物力学和生物学特性以及卓越的关节囊重建功能的材料和补片可能会改变巨大肩袖撕裂(RCT)的自然病程。
比较3种手术技术治疗巨大后上肩袖撕裂(RCT)的结构和临床疗效:双排(DR)技术、带可吸收补片加强的经骨等效(TOE)技术以及使用肱二头肌长头肌腱(LHBT)自体移植的上关节囊重建(SCR)技术。
队列研究;证据等级3。
我们回顾性分析了2007年1月至2017年3月间接受巨大后上肩袖撕裂修复手术的患者所采用的这3种技术。所有患者均完成了术前和术后24个月的评估:活动范围、主观肩部评分、简易肩部测试、美国肩肘外科医师(ASES)评分、疼痛视觉模拟量表以及Constant评分。术后1年通过超声评估肌腱完整性。
共有82例患者完成了最终评估(28例采用DR技术;30例采用TOE + 补片技术;24例采用带LHBT的SCR技术)。术前各组在统计学上具有可比性,但主动前屈和肌腱回缩在SCR组中明显更差(分别为P = 0.008和P = 0.001)。24个月后,各组的平均 ± 标准差评分如下:Constant评分为76 ± 10、72 ± 15和77 ± 10(P = 0.35);ASES评分为84 ± 10、84 ± 15和80 ± 15(P = 0.61);简易肩部测试评分为9 ± 2、9 ± 3和8 ± 3(P = 0.23);主观肩部评分为82 ± 15、80 ± 18和75 ± 18(P = 0.29);疼痛视觉模拟量表评分为1.4 ± 1.7、1.8 ± 2和1.4 ± 1.4(P = 0.65)。DR组、TOE + 补片组和SCR组手术侧肩部力量分别为4 ± 3 kg、4.7 ± 3 kg和6.4 ± 1.6 kg(P = 0.006)。术后12个月,超声检查显示DR组60.7%(28例中的17例)、TOE + 补片组56.7%(30例中的17例)和SCR组91.7%(该组24例中的22例)仍保持愈合状态。冈下肌腱在DR组75%的患者、TOE + 补片组76.5%的患者以及带LHBT的SCR组100%的患者中保持愈合状态(P = 0.006)。
对于巨大后上肩袖撕裂病例,带LHBT的SCR应被视为一种可靠、经济有效的治疗选择,可保护冈下肌的完整性。