Kopp Sabrina, Windschmitt Johannes, Schnauder Lena, Münzel Thomas, Keller Karsten, Karbach Susanne, Hobohm Lukas, Lurz Philipp, Sagoschen Ingo, Wild Johannes
Department of Cardiology, Cardiology I, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site RheinMain, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 17;13(8):2334. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082334.
The use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv-ECMO) in acute lung failure has witnessed a notable increase. The PiCCO system is frequently used for advanced hemodynamic monitoring in this cohort. Our study aimed to investigate whether the choice of indicator injection site (jugular vs. femoral) in patients undergoing vv-ECMO therapy affects transpulmonary thermodilution (TPTD) measurements using the PiCCO device (Pulsion Medical Systems SE, Munich, Germany). : In a retrospective single-center analysis, we compared thermodilution-derived hemodynamic parameters after simultaneous jugular and femoral injections in 28 measurements obtained in two patients with respiratory failure who were undergoing vv-ECMO therapy. : Elevated values of the extravascular lung water index (EVLWI), intrathoracic blood volume index (ITBVI) and global end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI) were observed following femoral indicator injection compared to jugular indicator injection (EVLWI: 29.3 ± 10.9 mL/kg vs. 18.3 ± 6.71 mL/kg, = 0.0003; ITBVI: 2163 ± 631 mL/m vs. 806 ± 125 mL/m, < 0.0001; GEDVI: 1731 ± 505 mL/m vs. 687 ± 141 mL/m, < 0.0001). The discrepancy between femoral and jugular measurements exhibited a linear correlation with extracorporeal blood flow (ECBF). : In a PiCCO®-derived hemodynamic assessment of patients on vv-ECMO, the femoral indicator injection, as opposed to the jugular injection, resulted in an overestimation of all index parameters. This discrepancy can be attributed to mean transit time (MTt) and downslope time-dependent (DSt) variations in GEDVI and cardiac function index and is correlated with ECBF.
静脉 - 静脉体外膜肺氧合(vv - ECMO)在急性肺衰竭中的应用显著增加。脉搏指示连续心输出量(PiCCO)系统常用于该人群的高级血流动力学监测。我们的研究旨在调查接受vv - ECMO治疗的患者中,指示物注射部位(颈内静脉与股静脉)的选择是否会影响使用PiCCO设备(德国慕尼黑普ulsion医疗系统公司)进行的经肺热稀释(TPTD)测量。:在一项回顾性单中心分析中,我们比较了在两名接受vv - ECMO治疗的呼吸衰竭患者中,同时进行颈内静脉和股静脉注射后通过热稀释法获得的血流动力学参数。:与颈内静脉注射指示物相比,股静脉注射指示物后观察到血管外肺水指数(EVLWI)、胸腔内血容量指数(ITBVI)和全心舒张末期容积指数(GEDVI)升高(EVLWI:29.3±10.9 mL/kg对18.3±6.71 mL/kg,P = 0.0003;ITBVI:2163±631 mL/m对806±125 mL/m,P < 0.0001;GEDVI:1731±505 mL/m对687±141 mL/m,P < 0.0001)。股静脉和颈内静脉测量值之间的差异与体外循环血流量(ECBF)呈线性相关。:在对接受vv - ECMO治疗的患者进行PiCCO®血流动力学评估时,与颈内静脉注射相比,股静脉注射指示物会导致所有指数参数的高估。这种差异可归因于GEDVI和心功能指数的平均通过时间(MTt)和下降斜率时间依赖性(DSt)变化,并且与ECBF相关。