Andrews Reed, Layuno-Matos Josué G, Frankle Mark A
Department of Orthopaedics, School of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA.
Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education, Tampa, FL 33607, USA.
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 18;13(8):2370. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082370.
In this era of subspecialty care in orthopedics, iterations of implant design can occur in a silo which then precludes gaining knowledge from failures of implant design that may have occurred in different subspecialties. This literature review describes the history of failures in hip and shoulder arthroplasties with the purpose of identifying similar factors that led to previous implant failures. A review of the literature was performed by two reviewers assessing articles that described failed hip and shoulder arthroplasty systems over time. We identified and analyzed 53 implant failures-23 in hip arthroplasty and 30 in shoulder arthroplasty. These failures were categorized as material, mechanical, and technical. In hip arthroplasty, 48% were material, 39% mechanical, and 13% technical failures. In shoulder arthroplasty, the distribution was 10% material, 70% mechanical, and 20% technical failures. The distribution of these failures highlights similar and sometimes repeated failure mechanisms between subspecialties. This accentuates the importance of a collaborative approach to improve future arthroplasty designs.
在这个骨科亚专业护理的时代,植入物设计的迭代可能在孤立的环境中进行,这就排除了从不同亚专业可能出现的植入物设计失败中获取知识的可能性。这篇文献综述描述了髋关节和肩关节置换术失败的历史,目的是识别导致先前植入物失败的相似因素。两位评审员对文献进行了回顾,评估了随着时间推移描述失败的髋关节和肩关节置换系统的文章。我们识别并分析了53例植入物失败案例——髋关节置换术23例,肩关节置换术30例。这些失败被分为材料、机械和技术方面。在髋关节置换术中,48%是材料方面的失败。39%是机械方面的失败,13%是技术方面的失败。在肩关节置换术中,分布情况是10%是材料方面的失败,70%是机械方面的失败,20%是技术方面的失败。这些失败的分布凸显了亚专业之间相似且有时重复的失败机制。这突出了采用协作方法改进未来关节置换术设计的重要性。