Takeshita Yuichiro, To Masako, Kurosawa Yusuke, Furusho Naho, Kinouchi Toru, Tsushima Kenji, Tada Yuji, To Yasuo, Sakao Seiichiro
Department of Pulmonary Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare Narita Hospital, 852 Hatakeda, Narita 286-8520, Japan.
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Saitama Medical Center, 2-1-50 Minami-Koshigaya, Koshigaya 343-8555, Japan.
J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 21;13(8):2427. doi: 10.3390/jcm13082427.
: The coagulation cascade due to tissue damage is considered to be one of the causes of poor prognostic outcomes in patients with acute exacerbations of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD). This study aimed to confirm coagulopathy in AE-ILD by evaluating the differences in the clinical characteristics of coagulation/fibrinolysis markers between stable ILD and AE-ILD. : Overall, 81 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study and categorized into the following two groups: a chronic ILD group comprising 63 outpatients and an acute ILD group comprising 18 inpatients diagnosed with AE-ILD. Serum markers, including thrombin-antithrombin III complex (TAT), D-dimer, plasmin-α2 plasmin inhibitor complex (PIC), and surfactant protein D (SP-D), were compared between the groups. : Among the 18 patients with acute ILD, 17 did not meet the International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis scoring system for disseminated intravascular coagulation. In acute ILD, the SP-D levels were statistically significantly positively correlated with TAT, D-dimer, and PIC levels, while the Krebs von den Lungen 6 (KL-6) levels showed no correlation with any of these coagulation/fibrinolytic markers. A positive correlation was observed between SP-D levels and TAT, D-dimer, and PIC levels in acute ILD. Serum TAT, D-dimer, and PIC all showed good area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) values in ROC analysis for the diagnosis of acute ILD. : In the clinical setting of AE-ILD, it may be important to focus not only on alveolar damage markers such as SP-D but also on coagulation/fibrinolytic markers including TAT, D-dimer, and PIC.
组织损伤导致的凝血级联反应被认为是间质性肺疾病急性加重期(AE-ILD)患者预后不良的原因之一。本研究旨在通过评估稳定期ILD和AE-ILD患者凝血/纤溶标志物临床特征的差异,来证实AE-ILD患者存在凝血病。:总体而言,81例患者纳入了这项回顾性研究,并分为以下两组:慢性ILD组,包括63例门诊患者;急性ILD组,包括18例诊断为AE-ILD的住院患者。比较两组之间的血清标志物,包括凝血酶-抗凝血酶III复合物(TAT)、D-二聚体、纤溶酶-α2纤溶酶抑制物复合物(PIC)和表面活性蛋白D(SP-D)。:在18例急性ILD患者中,17例不符合国际血栓与止血学会弥散性血管内凝血评分系统。在急性ILD中,SP-D水平与TAT、D-二聚体和PIC水平在统计学上呈显著正相关,而克雷伯斯肺表面活性蛋白6(KL-6)水平与这些凝血/纤溶标志物均无相关性。急性ILD中SP-D水平与TAT、D-二聚体和PIC水平呈正相关。血清TAT、D-二聚体和PIC在诊断急性ILD的受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积(AUC)值均良好。:在AE-ILD的临床环境中,不仅关注肺泡损伤标志物如SP-D,还关注包括TAT、D-二聚体和PIC在内的凝血/纤溶标志物可能很重要。