Pimentel Victor, Pingarilho Marta, Sebastião Cruz S, Miranda Mafalda, Gonçalves Fátima, Cabanas Joaquim, Costa Inês, Diogo Isabel, Fernandes Sandra, Costa Olga, Corte-Real Rita, Martins M Rosário O, Seabra Sofia G, Abecasis Ana B, Gomes Perpétua
Global Health and Tropical Medicine (GHTM), Associate Laboratory in Translation and Innovation Towards Global Health (LA-REAL), Instituto de Higiene e Medicina Tropical (IHMT), Universidade NOVA de Lisboa (UNL), Rua da Junqueira 100, 1349-008 Lisbon, Portugal.
Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Angola (CISA), Caxito, Angola.
Viruses. 2024 Apr 17;16(4):622. doi: 10.3390/v16040622.
The global scale-up of antiretroviral treatment (ART) offers significant health benefits by suppressing HIV-1 replication and increasing CD4 cell counts. However, incomplete viral suppression poses a potential threat for the emergence of drug resistance mutations (DRMs), limiting ART options, and increasing HIV transmission.
We investigated the patterns of transmitted drug resistance (TDR) and acquired drug resistance (ADR) among HIV-1 patients in Portugal.
Data were obtained from 1050 HIV-1 patient samples submitted for HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) testing from January 2022 to June 2023. Evaluation of DRM affecting viral susceptibility to nucleoside/tide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), protease inhibitors (PIs), and integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) was performed using an NGS technology, the Vela Diagnostics Sentosa SQ HIV-1 Genotyping Assay.
About 71% of patients were ART naïve and 29% were experienced. Overall, 20% presented with any DRM. The prevalence of TDR and ADR was 12.6% and 41.1%, respectively. M184V, T215S, and M41L mutations for NRTI, K103N for NNRTI, and M46I/L for PIs were frequent in naïve and treated patients. E138K and R263K mutations against INSTIs were more frequent in naïve than treated patients. TDR and ADR to INSTIs were 0.3% and 7%, respectively. Patients aged 50 or over (OR: 1.81, = 0.015), originating from Portuguese-speaking African countries (PALOPs) (OR: 1.55, = 0.050), HIV-1 subtype G (OR: 1.78, = 0.010), and with CD4 < 200 cells/mm (OR: 1.70, = 0.043) were more likely to present with DRMs, while the males (OR: 0.63, = 0.003) with a viral load between 4.1 to 5.0 Log (OR: 0.55, = 0.003) or greater than 5.0 Log (OR: 0.52, < 0.001), had lower chances of presenting with DRMs.
We present the first evidence on TDR and ADR to INSTI regimens in followed up patients presenting for healthcare in Portugal. We observed low levels of TDR to INSTIs among ART-naïve and moderate levels in ART-exposed patients. Regimens containing PIs could be an alternative second line in patients with intermediate or high-level drug resistance, especially against second-generation INSTIs (dolutegravir, bictegravir, and cabotegravir).
全球范围内扩大抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)通过抑制HIV-1复制和增加CD4细胞计数带来了显著的健康益处。然而,病毒抑制不完全对耐药突变(DRM)的出现构成潜在威胁,限制了ART选择,并增加了HIV传播。
我们调查了葡萄牙HIV-1患者中传播耐药(TDR)和获得性耐药(ADR)的模式。
数据来自2022年1月至2023年6月提交进行HIV耐药(HIVDR)检测的1050份HIV-1患者样本。使用一种二代测序(NGS)技术,即Vela Diagnostics Sentosa SQ HIV-1基因分型检测法,对影响病毒对核苷/核苷酸逆转录酶抑制剂(NRTIs)、非核苷逆转录酶抑制剂(NNRTIs)、蛋白酶抑制剂(PIs)和整合酶链转移抑制剂(INSTIs)敏感性的DRM进行评估。
约71%的患者为初治患者,29%为经治患者。总体而言,20%的患者存在任何DRM。TDR和ADR的患病率分别为12.6%和41.1%。NRTI的M184V、T215S和M41L突变,NNRTI的K103N突变以及PIs的M46I/L突变在初治和经治患者中都很常见。针对INSTIs的E138K和R263K突变在初治患者中比经治患者更常见。对INSTIs的TDR和ADR分别为百分之0.3和7%。年龄在50岁及以上的患者(比值比:1.81,P = 0.(此处原文有误,推测应为0.015))、来自非洲葡语国家(PALOPs)的患者(比值比:1.55,P = 0.050)、HIV-1 G亚型患者(比值比:1.78,P = 0.010)以及CD4细胞计数<200个/立方毫米的患者(比值比:1.70,P = 0.043)更有可能出现DRM,而病毒载量在4.1至5.0 Log之间(比值比:0.55,P = 0.003)或大于= 5.0 Log(比值比:0.52,P < 0.001)的男性出现DRM的几率较低。
我们提供了葡萄牙接受医疗保健的随访患者中对INSTI方案的TDR和ADR的首个证据。我们观察到初治患者中对INSTIs的TDR水平较低,而在接受过ART的患者中为中等水平。对于具有中高水平耐药性的患者,尤其是对第二代INSTIs(多替拉韦、比克替拉韦和卡博特韦)耐药的患者,含PIs的方案可能是一种替代二线方案。