Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
Biostatistics Core, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9S2):S110-S116. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.058. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
Cefazolin is the standard of care for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in the United States. The potential allergic cross-reactivity between cefazolin and penicillin causes uncertainty regarding optimal antibiotic choice in patients who have a reported penicillin allergy (rPCNA). The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of perioperative cefazolin in PCNA patients undergoing primary TJA.
We identified all patients (n = 49,842) undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (n = 25,659) or total knee arthroplasty (n = 24,183) from 2016 to 2022 who received perioperative intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis. Patients who had an rPCNA (n = 5,508) who received cefazolin (n = 4,938, 89.7%) were compared to rPCNA patients who did not (n = 570, 10.3%), and to patients who did not have an rPCNA (n = 43,359). The primary outcome was the rate of allergic reactions within 72 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the rates of superficial infections, deep infections, and Clostridioides difficile infections within 90 days.
The rate of allergic reactions was 0.1% (n = 5) in rPCNA patients who received cefazolin, compared to 0.2% (n = 1) in rPCNA patients who did not (P = .48) and 0.02% (n = 11) in patients who have no rPCNA (P = .02). Allergic reactions were mild in all 5 rPCNA patients who received cefazolin and were characterized by cutaneous symptoms (n = 4) or dyspnea in the absence of respiratory distress (n = 1) that resolved promptly with antibiotic discontinuation and administration of antihistamines and/or corticosteroids. We observed no differences in the rates of superficial infections (0.1 versus 0.2%, P = .58), deep infections (0.3 versus 0.4%, P = .68), or C difficile infections (0.04% versus 0%, P = .99) within 90 days in rPCNA patients who received cefazolin versus alternative perioperative antibiotics.
In this series of more than 5,500 patients who had an rPCNA undergoing primary TJA, perioperative prophylaxis with cefazolin resulted in a 0.1% incidence of allergic reactions that were clinically indolent. Cefazolin can be safely administered to most patients, independent of rPCNA severity.
III.
头孢唑林是美国全关节置换术(TJA)围手术期抗生素预防的标准治疗方法。头孢唑林和青霉素之间潜在的过敏交叉反应导致了在报告有青霉素过敏史(rPCNA)的患者中,对于最佳抗生素选择存在不确定性。本研究的目的是确定在接受初次 TJA 的 PCNA 患者中使用围手术期头孢唑林的安全性。
我们确定了 2016 年至 2022 年期间接受过围手术期静脉内抗生素预防的所有接受初次全髋关节置换术(n=25659)或全膝关节置换术(n=24183)的患者(n=49842)。在 rPCNA 患者中(n=5508),接受头孢唑林治疗的患者(n=4938,89.7%)与未接受头孢唑林治疗的 rPCNA 患者(n=570,10.3%)以及未发生 rPCNA 的患者(n=43359)进行了比较。主要结局是术后 72 小时内过敏反应的发生率。次要结局包括 90 天内浅表感染、深部感染和艰难梭菌感染的发生率。
在接受头孢唑林治疗的 rPCNA 患者中,过敏反应的发生率为 0.1%(n=5),而在未接受头孢唑林治疗的 rPCNA 患者中为 0.2%(n=1)(P=0.48),在无 rPCNA 的患者中为 0.02%(n=11)(P=0.02)。在接受头孢唑林治疗的所有 5 例 rPCNA 患者中,过敏反应均为轻度,表现为皮肤症状(n=4)或无呼吸窘迫的呼吸困难(n=1),抗生素停药后迅速缓解,并给予抗组胺药和/或皮质类固醇治疗。我们观察到在接受头孢唑林治疗的 rPCNA 患者中,90 天内浅表感染(0.1%对 0.2%,P=0.58)、深部感染(0.3%对 0.4%,P=0.68)或艰难梭菌感染(0.04%对 0%,P=0.99)的发生率无差异。
在这项超过 5500 例 rPCNA 患者接受初次 TJA 的研究中,头孢唑林围手术期预防治疗导致 0.1%的过敏反应,临床症状较轻。头孢唑林可以安全地用于大多数患者,而与 rPCNA 的严重程度无关。
III。