Suppr超能文献

围手术期头孢唑啉用于青霉素过敏的全关节置换术患者:安全吗?

Perioperative Cefazolin for Total Joint Arthroplasty Patients Who Have a Penicillin Allergy: Is It Safe?

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.

Biostatistics Core, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York.

出版信息

J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9S2):S110-S116. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.058. Epub 2024 Apr 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cefazolin is the standard of care for perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) in the United States. The potential allergic cross-reactivity between cefazolin and penicillin causes uncertainty regarding optimal antibiotic choice in patients who have a reported penicillin allergy (rPCNA). The purpose of this study was to determine the safety of perioperative cefazolin in PCNA patients undergoing primary TJA.

METHODS

We identified all patients (n = 49,842) undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (n = 25,659) or total knee arthroplasty (n = 24,183) from 2016 to 2022 who received perioperative intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis. Patients who had an rPCNA (n = 5,508) who received cefazolin (n = 4,938, 89.7%) were compared to rPCNA patients who did not (n = 570, 10.3%), and to patients who did not have an rPCNA (n = 43,359). The primary outcome was the rate of allergic reactions within 72 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included the rates of superficial infections, deep infections, and Clostridioides difficile infections within 90 days.

RESULTS

The rate of allergic reactions was 0.1% (n = 5) in rPCNA patients who received cefazolin, compared to 0.2% (n = 1) in rPCNA patients who did not (P = .48) and 0.02% (n = 11) in patients who have no rPCNA (P = .02). Allergic reactions were mild in all 5 rPCNA patients who received cefazolin and were characterized by cutaneous symptoms (n = 4) or dyspnea in the absence of respiratory distress (n = 1) that resolved promptly with antibiotic discontinuation and administration of antihistamines and/or corticosteroids. We observed no differences in the rates of superficial infections (0.1 versus 0.2%, P = .58), deep infections (0.3 versus 0.4%, P = .68), or C difficile infections (0.04% versus 0%, P = .99) within 90 days in rPCNA patients who received cefazolin versus alternative perioperative antibiotics.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series of more than 5,500 patients who had an rPCNA undergoing primary TJA, perioperative prophylaxis with cefazolin resulted in a 0.1% incidence of allergic reactions that were clinically indolent. Cefazolin can be safely administered to most patients, independent of rPCNA severity.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

背景

头孢唑林是美国全关节置换术(TJA)围手术期抗生素预防的标准治疗方法。头孢唑林和青霉素之间潜在的过敏交叉反应导致了在报告有青霉素过敏史(rPCNA)的患者中,对于最佳抗生素选择存在不确定性。本研究的目的是确定在接受初次 TJA 的 PCNA 患者中使用围手术期头孢唑林的安全性。

方法

我们确定了 2016 年至 2022 年期间接受过围手术期静脉内抗生素预防的所有接受初次全髋关节置换术(n=25659)或全膝关节置换术(n=24183)的患者(n=49842)。在 rPCNA 患者中(n=5508),接受头孢唑林治疗的患者(n=4938,89.7%)与未接受头孢唑林治疗的 rPCNA 患者(n=570,10.3%)以及未发生 rPCNA 的患者(n=43359)进行了比较。主要结局是术后 72 小时内过敏反应的发生率。次要结局包括 90 天内浅表感染、深部感染和艰难梭菌感染的发生率。

结果

在接受头孢唑林治疗的 rPCNA 患者中,过敏反应的发生率为 0.1%(n=5),而在未接受头孢唑林治疗的 rPCNA 患者中为 0.2%(n=1)(P=0.48),在无 rPCNA 的患者中为 0.02%(n=11)(P=0.02)。在接受头孢唑林治疗的所有 5 例 rPCNA 患者中,过敏反应均为轻度,表现为皮肤症状(n=4)或无呼吸窘迫的呼吸困难(n=1),抗生素停药后迅速缓解,并给予抗组胺药和/或皮质类固醇治疗。我们观察到在接受头孢唑林治疗的 rPCNA 患者中,90 天内浅表感染(0.1%对 0.2%,P=0.58)、深部感染(0.3%对 0.4%,P=0.68)或艰难梭菌感染(0.04%对 0%,P=0.99)的发生率无差异。

结论

在这项超过 5500 例 rPCNA 患者接受初次 TJA 的研究中,头孢唑林围手术期预防治疗导致 0.1%的过敏反应,临床症状较轻。头孢唑林可以安全地用于大多数患者,而与 rPCNA 的严重程度无关。

证据水平

III。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验