Suppr超能文献

贝叶斯估计在猪场内检测猪蛔虫感染的粪便和血清学诊断试验的敏感性和特异性。

Bayesian estimation of the sensitivity and specificity of coprological and serological diagnostic tests for the detection of Ascaris suum infection on pig farms.

机构信息

ANSES, École Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort, Laboratoire de Santé Animale USC EPIMAI, 7 avenue du Général de Gaulle, 94700 Maisons-Alfort, France.

ANSES, Laboratoire de Ploufragan-Plouzané-Niort, BP 53, 22440 Ploufragan, France.

出版信息

Int J Parasitol. 2024 Aug;54(10):523-533. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2024.04.010. Epub 2024 Apr 25.

Abstract

Coprological and serological diagnostic tests were compared to define the status of a pig farm with regard to Ascaris suum. On each of the 100 farms in France visited for the study, 10 blood samples were taken from pigs at the end of fattening (at least 22 weeks old) and 20 to 30 faecal samples were taken, depending on the category of animals present on the farm (10 sows, 10 piglets aged 10 to 12 weeks and 10 pigs at the end of fattening, aged at least 22 weeks). A SERASCA® ELISA test (Laboratory of Parasitology, Ghent University) was performed on each blood sample (cut-off 0.5) and a coprological analysis on each faecal sample. A Bayesian approach was used to estimate the sensitivity and specificity of the coprological and serological tests. A farm was considered positive if at least one A. suum egg was observed in the faecal samples. With regard to the serological test, various hypotheses were tested in order to define the number of seropositive animals required to consider a farm positive for A. suum. The coprological test has very good specificity in the search for A. suum, whether 20 or 30 samples are taken per farm. However, even with an increase in the number of samples, the sensitivity of this diagnostic approach is very low (less than 30%). On the other hand, the serological diagnostic method, which consists of taking blood samples from 10 animals at the end of fattening, has good sensitivity and seems better suited to defining the status of a farm with regard to A. suum, provided that a farm is considered seropositive only if two out of 10 samples are positive.

摘要

为了确定法国 100 个猪场中每一个猪场感染猪蛔虫的状况,对粪便和血清学诊断试验进行了比较。在研究中,对每个猪场的 100 头猪进行了检查,在育肥结束时(至少 22 周龄)采集了 10 份血样,根据猪场动物的种类(10 头母猪、10 头 10-12 周龄仔猪和 10 头育肥结束、至少 22 周龄的猪)采集了 20-30 份粪便样本。对每份血样(截止值 0.5)进行了 SERASCA® ELISA 检测(根特大学寄生虫学实验室),对每份粪便样本进行了粪便分析。采用贝叶斯方法来估计粪便学和血清学检测的敏感性和特异性。如果粪便样本中至少观察到一个猪蛔虫卵,则认为该猪场为阳性。关于血清学检测,对各种假设进行了测试,以确定需要多少血清学阳性动物来确定猪场是否感染猪蛔虫。无论每个猪场采集 20 份还是 30 份粪便样本,粪便学检测在寻找猪蛔虫方面都具有非常好的特异性。然而,即使增加了样本数量,这种诊断方法的敏感性也非常低(不到 30%)。另一方面,血清学诊断方法,即从育肥结束时的 10 头猪采集血样,具有良好的敏感性,似乎更适合于确定猪场感染猪蛔虫的状况,前提是只有当 10 份样本中有两份呈阳性时,才认为猪场呈血清学阳性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验