Nov-Klaiman Tamar, Bowman-Smart Hilary, Horn Ruth
Institute of Ethics and History of Health in Society, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Australian Centre for Precision Health, Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.
Eur J Hum Genet. 2025 Mar;33(2):220-225. doi: 10.1038/s41431-024-01612-z. Epub 2024 Apr 27.
Foetal-related severity is a key concept in policy and legislation relating to access to both reproductive technologies and selective abortions in many countries around the world, but not in Germany. This study sheds light on how 'severity' in the context of prenatal testing is understood and negotiated within the particular socio-cultural and legal context of Germany, where 'severity' relating to foetal clinical findings neither counts as a justification to implement population prenatal screening programs, nor as a legal ground to terminate pregnancy. This study explores the views of women who undergo prenatal testing, as well as of professionals who encounter them, through semi-structured interviews. It showcases how they frame severity and questions whether the existing legal and regulatory framework relating to prenatal testing and termination of pregnancy addresses their concerns and needs regarding reproductive decision-making. The interviews (n = 27) reveal that despite it being legally outside the explicit reasons for testing and termination of pregnancy, both women and professionals negotiate severity behind the scenes. Their interpretation of severity is highly context-dependent and relies on clinical, social and familial facets. Their perceptions of severity guide them in their handling of and decision-making around pregnancy management. Acknowledging the personal nature of severity assessment and providing professional or legal guidance which explicitly mentions foetal anomaly as a legitimate factor in pregnancy management could provide healthcare professionals and patients with the room needed to manage the pregnancy favourably.
在世界上许多国家,与获取生殖技术和选择性堕胎相关的政策和立法中,胎儿相关的严重性是一个关键概念,但在德国并非如此。本研究揭示了在德国特定的社会文化和法律背景下,产前检测背景下的“严重性”是如何被理解和协商的,在德国,与胎儿临床发现相关的“严重性”既不被视为实施人群产前筛查项目的理由,也不被视为终止妊娠的法律依据。本研究通过半结构化访谈探讨了接受产前检测的女性以及接触她们的专业人员的观点。它展示了他们如何界定严重性,并质疑现有的与产前检测和终止妊娠相关的法律和监管框架是否解决了他们在生殖决策方面的担忧和需求。访谈(n = 27)显示,尽管在法律上它不属于检测和终止妊娠的明确理由,但女性和专业人员都在幕后协商严重性。他们对严重性的解释高度依赖于具体情境,并依赖于临床、社会和家庭等方面。他们对严重性的认知在他们处理妊娠管理和围绕妊娠管理进行决策时为他们提供指导。承认严重性评估的个人性质,并提供明确将胎儿异常作为妊娠管理中合法因素提及的专业或法律指导,可为医疗保健专业人员和患者提供有利管理妊娠所需的空间。