• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

政府财政分权与雾霾和碳减排:来自财政省管县改革的证据。

Government fiscal decentralization and haze and carbon reduction: Evidence from the fiscal Province-Managing-County reform.

机构信息

Business School, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, 250358, China.

School of Urban and Regional Sciences, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, 200433, China.

出版信息

Environ Res. 2024 Jul 1;252(Pt 3):119020. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119020. Epub 2024 Apr 26.

DOI:10.1016/j.envres.2024.119020
PMID:38679276
Abstract

Government governance reform is not only a vital motivation for high economic quality but also an important factor in stimulating the government's environmental governance responsibility. The article empirically examines the fiscal Province-Managing-County (PMC) pilot reform on the synergic governance of haze and carbon reduction and its mechanism. The results show that the policy helps to realize the synergic governance of haze and carbon reduction, and the reform of fiscal Province-Managing-County promotes regional haze and carbon reduction mainly through structural effect, innovation effect, and fiscal expenditure responsibility effect. The heterogeneity analysis shows that the policy has an asymmetric effect on haze and carbon reduction under different administrative structures, economic structures and levels of government intervention. Further analysis shows a policy linkage effect between this policy and the Green Fiscal Policy. The policy has the situation of blood-sucking in the provincial capital city and leads to an increase in financial funds. The above results prove that the policy can help to realize haze and carbon reduction and provide practical ideas for the further expansion of the policy. At the same time, it provides the direction for the local government to realize the double-carbon goal.

摘要

政府治理改革不仅是实现高质量经济的重要动力,也是激发政府环境治理责任的重要因素。本文实证检验了雾霾与碳减排协同治理的财政省管县(PMC)试点改革及其机制。结果表明,该政策有助于实现雾霾与碳减排的协同治理,财政省管县改革主要通过结构效应、创新效应和财政支出责任效应促进区域雾霾和碳减排。异质性分析表明,在不同的行政结构、经济结构和政府干预程度下,该政策对雾霾和碳减排具有非对称效应。进一步的分析表明,该政策与绿色财政政策之间存在政策联动效应。政策存在省会吸血现象,导致财政资金增加。上述结果证明,该政策有助于实现雾霾与碳减排,并为进一步扩大政策提供了实践思路。同时,为地方政府实现双碳目标提供了方向。

相似文献

1
Government fiscal decentralization and haze and carbon reduction: Evidence from the fiscal Province-Managing-County reform.政府财政分权与雾霾和碳减排:来自财政省管县改革的证据。
Environ Res. 2024 Jul 1;252(Pt 3):119020. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2024.119020. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
2
Fiscal decentralization, government innovation preference, and haze pollution.财政分权、政府创新偏好与雾霾污染
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Oct;29(46):69818-69830. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20717-w. Epub 2022 May 16.
3
Impact of fiscal decentralization on firm environmental performance: evidence from a county-level fiscal reform in China.财政分权对企业环境绩效的影响:来自中国县级财政改革的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Oct;27(29):36147-36159. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09663-7. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
4
Fiscal decentralization, leader localization, and reduction of pollution and carbon emissions -empirical evidence from China's fiscal "province-managing-county" reform.财政分权、领导人本地化与污染和碳排放减少——来自中国财政“省管县”改革的经验证据。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Jun;360:121175. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121175. Epub 2024 May 14.
5
The spatial effect of fiscal decentralization on haze pollution in China.财政分权对中国雾霾污染的空间效应。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Sep;28(36):49774-49787. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14176-y. Epub 2021 May 3.
6
The role of Chinese-style fiscal decentralization in promoting synergistic carbon and haze governance: insights from technological innovation.中国式财政分权在促进碳与雾霾协同治理中的作用:来自技术创新的见解
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 May;31(25):36417-36439. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30660-z. Epub 2023 Nov 9.
7
The province-managing-county reform and green innovation of enterprises: evidence from the quasi-natural experiment.省管县改革与企业绿色创新:来自准自然实验的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Dec;29(59):88823-88838. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-21834-2. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
8
Like the new and hate the old: The impact of fiscal decentralization on regional development strategy.喜新厌旧:财政分权对区域发展战略的影响。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 9;17(9):e0273875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273875. eCollection 2022.
9
Fiscal Decentralization, Green Technology Innovation, and Regional Air Pollution in China: An Investigation from the Perspective of Intergovernmental Competition.财政分权、绿色技术创新与中国区域大气污染:基于府际竞争视角的考察。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 11;19(14):8456. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148456.
10
Regional policy synergy and haze governance-empirical evidence from 281 prefecture-level cities in China.区域政策协同与雾霾治理——来自中国 281 个地级市的经验证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Mar;28(9):10763-10779. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-11251-8. Epub 2020 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiscale exploration of spatiotemporal dynamics and decoupling effects of carbon emissions in China.中国碳排放时空动态及解耦效应的多尺度探索
Sci Rep. 2025 May 13;15(1):16554. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00677-0.