Shahrzad Sinead, Overbeck Gritt, Holm Anne, Høj Kirsten, Hølmkjaer Pernille
Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Section of General Practice and Research Unit for General Practice, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Research Unit for General Practice, Aarhus, Denmark.
BMC Nurs. 2024 Apr 28;23(1):287. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-01932-x.
Despite recommendations against psychotropic medication in older nursing homes residents with behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), antidepressants and other psychotropic drugs are still prescribed. We performed a cluster-randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of a complex intervention aiming to promote the deprescribing of antidepressants in institutionalized older persons with dementia. To understand the underlying mechanisms of trial outcomes, we conducted a process evaluation exploring the interventions implementation, areas of impact, and contextual factors. The aim of this study was to explore the implementation process and the key factors that promoted and inhibited intervention implementation in the care home setting (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04985305. Registered 30 July 2021).
Qualitative interviews were conducted between August 2022 and February 2023 with four general practitioners and eight nursing home staff from four associated nursing homes in the Capital Region of Denmark. We coded the interview data according to the four constructs of the Normalization Process Theory (coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring).
There was a common understanding of the intervention aim. We observed a raised awareness concerning the deprescription of antidepressants among healthcare professionals with good collaboration (coherence). An overall buy-in to a deprescribing mentality was seen (cognitive participation). There were barriers to the GPs and nursing home staff's use of the intervention elements and how they implemented it, but to some, a common language was created (collective action). Professionals overall valued the idea of deprescribing, but lack of time, high staff turnover, and low education level among nursing home staff hampered the integration (reflexive monitoring).
Successful implementation seemed to be dependent on the quality of the relationship between the single GP and the single nursing home professional. A common deprescribing mentality promoted the uptake of the intervention. However, several barriers related to lack of resources hindered implementation. It is imperative to adapt complex interventions to the available resources and context.
尽管有建议反对在患有痴呆症行为和心理症状(BPSD)的老年疗养院居民中使用精神药物,但抗抑郁药和其他精神药物仍在被开具处方。我们进行了一项整群随机对照试验,以评估一项旨在促进在机构化老年痴呆症患者中停用抗抑郁药的综合干预措施的效果。为了解试验结果的潜在机制,我们进行了一项过程评估,探讨干预措施的实施情况、影响领域和背景因素。本研究的目的是探讨在养老院环境中干预措施的实施过程以及促进和抑制干预措施实施的关键因素(Clinicaltrials.gov:NCT04985305。于2021年7月30日注册)。
在2022年8月至2023年2月期间,对丹麦首都地区四家相关养老院的四名全科医生和八名养老院工作人员进行了定性访谈。我们根据正常化过程理论的四个构建要素(连贯性、认知参与、集体行动和反思性监测)对访谈数据进行编码。
对干预目标有共同的理解。我们观察到,在合作良好的医疗专业人员中,对抗抑郁药减药的认识有所提高(连贯性)。总体上看到了对减药心态的认同(认知参与)。全科医生和养老院工作人员在使用干预要素及其实施方式方面存在障碍,但在某些方面,创造了一种共同语言(集体行动)。专业人员总体上重视减药的理念,但养老院工作人员缺乏时间、人员流动率高和教育水平低阻碍了整合(反思性监测)。
成功实施似乎取决于单个全科医生与单个养老院专业人员之间关系的质量。共同的减药心态促进了对干预措施的接受。然而,一些与资源短缺相关的障碍阻碍了实施。必须根据可用资源和背景调整综合干预措施。