Uebel Astrid Saermark, Pedersen Michael Bjerre, Beedholm Kristian, Stidsholt Laura, Skalshøi Marie Rosenkjaer, Foskolos Ilias, Madsen Peter Teglberg
Section for Zoophysiology, Department of Biology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Department of Evolutionary Ecology, Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research, Berlin, Germany.
BMC Zool. 2024 Apr 29;9(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s40850-024-00200-4.
Most bats hunt insects on the wing at night using echolocation as their primary sensory modality, but nevertheless maintain complex eye anatomy and functional vision. This raises the question of how and when insectivorous bats use vision during their largely nocturnal lifestyle. Here, we test the hypothesis that the small insectivorous bat, Myotis daubentonii, relies less on echolocation, or dispenses with it entirely, as visual cues become available during challenging acoustic noise conditions. We trained five wild-caught bats to land on a spherical target in both silence and when exposed to broad-band noise to decrease echo detectability, while light conditions were manipulated in both spectrum and intensity. We show that during noise exposure, the bats were almost three times more likely to use multiple attempts to solve the task compared to in silent controls. Furthermore, the bats exhibited a Lombard response of 0.18 dB/dB and decreased call intervals earlier in their flight during masking noise exposures compared to in silent controls. Importantly, however, these adjustments in movement and echolocation behaviour did not differ between light and dark control treatments showing that small insectivorous bats maintain the same echolocation behaviour when provided with visual cues under challenging conditions for echolocation. We therefore conclude that bat echolocation is a hard-wired sensory system with stereotyped compensation strategies to both target range and masking noise (i.e. Lombard response) irrespective of light conditions. In contrast, the adjustments of call intervals and movement strategies during noise exposure varied substantially between individuals indicating a degree of flexibility that likely requires higher order processing and perhaps vocal learning.
大多数蝙蝠在夜间利用回声定位作为主要感官方式在空中捕食昆虫,但仍保持着复杂的眼部解剖结构和功能性视觉。这就引发了一个问题:食虫蝙蝠在其主要为夜间的生活方式中如何以及何时使用视觉。在这里,我们测试了一个假设,即小型食虫蝙蝠——道氏鼠耳蝠,在具有挑战性的声学噪声条件下,随着视觉线索变得可用,它对回声定位的依赖会减少,或者完全摒弃回声定位。我们训练了五只野生捕获的蝙蝠,让它们在安静环境中以及暴露于宽带噪声以降低回声可探测性的情况下降落在一个球形目标上,同时对光谱和强度方面的光照条件进行了操控。我们发现,在噪声暴露期间,与安静对照组相比,蝙蝠解决任务时使用多次尝试的可能性几乎高出三倍。此外,与安静对照组相比,在掩蔽噪声暴露期间,蝙蝠表现出0.18分贝/分贝的伦巴德效应,并且在飞行早期缩短了叫声间隔。然而,重要的是,在明亮和黑暗对照处理之间,这些运动和回声定位行为的调整没有差异,这表明小型食虫蝙蝠在回声定位面临挑战的条件下获得视觉线索时,会保持相同的回声定位行为。因此,我们得出结论,蝙蝠的回声定位是一个硬连线的感官系统,具有针对目标距离和掩蔽噪声的固定补偿策略(即伦巴德效应),与光照条件无关。相比之下,在噪声暴露期间,叫声间隔和运动策略的调整在个体之间差异很大,这表明存在一定程度的灵活性,这可能需要更高层次的处理,甚至可能需要发声学习。