Kahn S A, Raghava N, Gaweda G, Hink A, Holmes Iv J, Hickerson W, Carter J E
Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, USA.
Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston Salem, NC, USA.
Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2023 Dec 31;36(4):355-360. eCollection 2023 Dec.
Minimally invasive surgery is becoming the standard of care across surgical subspecialties. Several new "minimally invasive" options for burn debridement and autografting exist. Enzymatic bromelain-based debridement (BBD) and autologous skin cell spray (ASCS) have independently proven to reduce the rate of split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) and decrease donor site size when grafting is performed. There is a paucity in the literature regarding the combination of these two therapies. The purpose of this study is to characterize a cohort of patients treated with both BBD and ASCS and qualitatively compare data to expected outcomes without these therapies. This retrospective study of a single academic burn center's experience using BBD and ASCS together included 13 patients with a total burn surface area (TBSA) from 1-30% and all had >50% deep partial thickness. All patients received BBD and ASCS. Deeper burns additionally received STSG with ASCS overspray. Median burn size was 14% TBSA (IQR:5.45,20), donor site size was 225 sq cm (IQR:28.5,556.5), and ratio of donor site area to total treatment area of 0.082 (IQR: 0.039, 0.241) was observed. Median observed length of stay (LOS) was 19 days (IQR:10,27), expected LOS was 15.4 days, and O/E ratio 1.06. Donor sites in both groups of patients were much smaller than expected versus treatment with conventional meshed STSG alone and length of stay is lower than expected based on burn size. An emphasis on expenses and scar development will guide future studies into the patient subset and wound features that are best for this combination treatment.
微创手术正成为各个外科亚专业的治疗标准。目前有几种新的烧伤清创和自体植皮的“微创”方法。基于菠萝蛋白酶的酶促清创术(BBD)和自体皮肤细胞喷雾(ASCS)已分别证明,在进行植皮时可降低中厚皮片移植(STSG)的发生率,并减小供皮区面积。关于这两种疗法联合使用的文献较少。本研究的目的是对接受BBD和ASCS联合治疗的患者队列进行特征描述,并将数据与未采用这些疗法时的预期结果进行定性比较。这项对单一学术性烧伤中心联合使用BBD和ASCS经验的回顾性研究纳入了13例患者,其烧伤总面积(TBSA)为1%-30%,且所有患者深度部分厚度烧伤均超过50%。所有患者均接受了BBD和ASCS治疗。深度烧伤患者还额外接受了ASCS喷洒的STSG治疗。烧伤面积中位数为TBSA的14%(四分位间距:5.45,20),供皮区面积为225平方厘米(四分位间距:28.5,556.5),观察到供皮区面积与总治疗面积之比为0.082(四分位间距:0.039,0.241)。观察到的住院时间中位数为19天(四分位间距:10,27),预期住院时间为15.4天,观察值与预期值之比为1.06。与仅采用传统网状STSG治疗相比,两组患者的供皮区都比预期小得多,且住院时间低于基于烧伤面积的预期值。对费用和瘢痕形成的关注将指导未来针对最适合这种联合治疗的患者亚组和伤口特征的研究。