Zeng Tao, Ye Jian-Zhong, Qin Hui, Xu Qian-Qian
College of Medicine, Jingchu University of Technology Jingmen, Jingmen 448000, Hubei Province, China.
World J Clin Cases. 2024 Apr 26;12(12):2056-2064. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i12.2056.
Various non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been used for juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). However, the optimal method for JIA has not yet been developed.
To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis to determine the optimal instructions.
We searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar, CNKI, and Wanfang without restriction for publication date or language at August, 2023. Any RCTs that comparing the effectiveness of NSAIDs with each other or placebo for JIA were included in this network meta-analysis. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) analysis was used to rank the treatments. value less than 0.05 was identified as statistically significant.
We included 8 RCTs (1127 patients) comparing 8 different instructions including meloxicam (0.125 qd and 0.250 qd), Celecoxib (3 mg/kg bid and 6 mg/kg bid), piroxicam, Naproxen (5.0 mg/kg/d, 7.5 mg/kg/d and 12.5 mg/kg/d), inuprofen (30-40 mg/kg/d), Aspirin (60-80 mg/kg/d, 75 mg/kg/d, and 55 mg/kg/d), Tolmetin (15 mg/kg/d), Rofecoxib, and placebo. There were no significant differences between any two NSAIDs regarding ACR Pedi 30 response. The SUCRA shows that celecoxib (6 mg/kg bid) ranked first (SUCRA, 88.9%), rofecoxib ranked second (SUCRA, 68.1%), Celecoxib (3 mg/kg bid) ranked third (SUCRA, 51.0%). There were no significant differences between any two NSAIDs regarding adverse events. The SUCRA shows that placebo ranked first (SUCRA, 88.2%), piroxicam ranked second (SUCRA, 60.5%), rofecoxib (0.6 mg/kg qd) ranked third (SUCRA, 56.1%), meloxicam (0.125 mg/kg qd) ranked fourth (SUCRA, 56.1%), and rofecoxib (0.3 mg/kg qd) ranked fifth (SUCRA, 56.1%).
In summary, celecoxib (6 mg/kg bid) was found to be the most effective NSAID for treating JIA. Rofecoxib, piroxicam, and meloxicam may be safer options, but further research is needed to confirm these findings in larger trials with higher quality studies.
多种非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)已用于青少年特发性关节炎(JIA)。然而,尚未开发出治疗JIA的最佳方法。
进行系统评价和网状Meta分析以确定最佳用药方案。
我们于2023年8月在PubMed、EMBASE、谷歌学术、中国知网和万方数据库中检索随机对照试验(RCTs),对发表日期和语言均无限制。任何比较NSAIDs相互之间或与安慰剂治疗JIA有效性的RCTs均纳入本网状Meta分析。采用累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)分析对治疗方法进行排序。P值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
我们纳入了8项RCTs(1127例患者),比较了8种不同用药方案,包括美洛昔康(0.125qd和0.250qd)、塞来昔布(3mg/kg bid和6mg/kg bid)、吡罗昔康、萘普生(5.0mg/kg/d、7.5mg/kg/d和12.5mg/kg/d)、布洛芬(30 - 40mg/kg/d)、阿司匹林(60 - 80mg/kg/d、75mg/kg/d和55mg/kg/d)、托美丁(15mg/kg/d)、罗非昔布和安慰剂。在ACR Pedi 30反应方面,任意两种NSAIDs之间均无显著差异。SUCRA分析显示,塞来昔布(6mg/kg bid)排名第一(SUCRA,88.9%),罗非昔布排名第二(SUCRA,68.1%),塞来昔布(3mg/kg bid)排名第三(SUCRA,51.0%)。在不良事件方面,任意两种NSAIDs之间均无显著差异。SUCRA分析显示,安慰剂排名第一(SUCRA,88.2%),吡罗昔康排名第二(SUCRA,60.5%),罗非昔布(0.6mg/kg qd)排名第三(SUCRA,56.1%),美洛昔康(0.125mg/kg qd)排名第四(SUCRA,56.1%),罗非昔布(0.3mg/kg qd)排名第五(SUCRA,56.1%)。
总之,发现塞来昔布(6mg/kg bid)是治疗JIA最有效的NSAID。罗非昔布、吡罗昔康和美洛昔康可能是更安全的选择,但需要在更大规模、更高质量的试验中进一步研究以证实这些发现。