Lee Alfred S Y, Xu Shebe Siwei, Yung Patrick S H, Ong Michael T Y, Chan Chetwyn C H, Chung Joan S K, Chan Derwin K C
Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Centre for Child and Family Science, The Education University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 12;15:1284745. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1284745. eCollection 2024.
This study aimed to develop and validate a new measurement tool, the Rehabilitation Adherence Inventory (RAI), to measure patients' rehabilitation adherence. We recruited 236 patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures from the United Kingdom (Mage = 33.58 ± 10.03, range = 18 to 59; female = 46.2%). Participants completed a survey, that measured their rehabilitation adherence, rehabilitation volume, psychological needs support, autonomous motivation, and intention at baseline, and at the 2nd and 4th month. Factorial, convergent, discriminant, concurrent, predictive, ecological validity and test-retest reliability of the RAI were tested via exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and structural equation modelling (SEM). All the EFAs, CFAs, and SEMs yielded acceptable to excellent goodness-of-fit, χ2 = 10.51 to 224.12, df = 9 to 161, CFI > 0.95, TLI > 0.95, RMSEA <0.09 [90%C I < 0.06 to 0.12], SRMR <0.04. Results fully supported the RAI's factorial, convergent, discriminant, and ecological validity, and test-retest reliability. The concurrent and predictive validity of the RAI was only partially supported because the RAI scores at baseline was positively associated with rehabilitation frequency at all time points ( = 0.34 to 0.38, < 0.001), but its corresponding associations with rehabilitation duration were not statistically significant ( = 0.07 to 0.93). Overall, our findings suggest that this six-item RAI is a reliable and valid tool for evaluating patients' rehabilitation adherence.
本研究旨在开发并验证一种新的测量工具——康复依从性量表(RAI),以测量患者的康复依从性。我们从英国招募了236名前交叉韧带(ACL)断裂患者(年龄中位数Mage = 33.58 ± 10.03,范围 = 18至59岁;女性 = 46.2%)。参与者在基线、第2个月和第4个月时完成了一项调查,该调查测量了他们的康复依从性、康复量、心理需求支持、自主动机和意向。通过探索性因素分析(EFA)、验证性因素分析(CFA)和结构方程建模(SEM)对RAI的因素效度、收敛效度、区分效度、同时效度、预测效度、生态效度和重测信度进行了测试。所有的EFA、CFA和SEM均产生了可接受至优秀的拟合优度,χ2 = 10.51至224.12,df = 9至161,CFI > 0.95,TLI > 0.95,RMSEA < 0.09 [90%CI < 0.06至0.12],SRMR < 0.04。结果充分支持了RAI的因素效度、收敛效度、区分效度和生态效度以及重测信度。RAI的同时效度和预测效度仅得到部分支持,因为基线时的RAI得分与所有时间点的康复频率呈正相关(r = 0.34至0.38,p < 0.001),但其与康复持续时间的相应关联无统计学意义(r = 0.07至0.93)。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,这个包含六个条目的RAI是评估患者康复依从性的可靠且有效的工具。