Investigating the Mechanistic of Danhong Injection in Brain Damage Caused by Cardiac I/R Injury via Bioinformatics, Computer Simulation, and Experimental Validation.

OBJECTIVE

Cardiac ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury has negative effects on the brain and can even lead to the occurrence of ischemic stroke. Clinical evidence shows that Danhong injection (DHI) protects the heart and brain following ischemic events. This study investigated the mechanisms and key active compounds underlying the therapeutic effect of DHI against brain damage induced by cardiac I/R injury.

METHODS

The gene expression omnibus database provided GSE66360 and GSE22255 data sets. The R programming language was used to identify the common differentially expressed genes (cDEGs). Gene ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes enrichment analysis were performed, and protein-protein interaction network was constructed. Active compounds of DHI were collected from the Traditional Chinese Medicine Systems Pharmacology database. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations were performed. The MMPBSA method was used to calculate the binding-free energy. The pkCSM server and DruLiTo software were used for Absorption, Distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity (ADMET) analysis and drug-likeness analysis. Finally, in vitro experiments were conducted to validate the results.

RESULTS

A total of 27 cDEGs had been identified. The PPI and enrichment results indicated that TNF-α was considered to be the core target. A total of 80 active compounds were retrieved. The molecular docking results indicated that tanshinone I (TSI), tanshinone IIA (TSIIA), and hydroxyl safflower yellow A (HSYA) were selected as core active compounds. Molecular dynamics verification revealed that the conformations were relatively stable without significant fluctuations. MMPBSA analysis revealed that the binding energies of TSI, TSIIA, and HSYA with TNF-α were -36.01, -21.71, and -14.80 kcal/mol, respectively. LEU57 residue of TNF-α has the highest contribution. TSI and TSIIA passed both the ADMET analysis and drug-likeness screening, whereas HSYA did not. Experimental verification confirmed that DHI and TSIIA reduced the expression of TNF-α, NLRP3, and IL-1β in the injured H9C2 and rat brain microvascular endothelial cells.

CONCLUSION

TNF-α can be considered to be a key target for BD-CI/R. TSIIA in DHI exerts a significant inhibitory effect on the inflammatory damage of BD-CI/R, providing new insights for future drug development.