• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新加坡亚洲患者尿路结石管理中单猪尾缝线支架非随机审计的结果

Outcomes of a non-randomised audit of single pigtail suture stents in urolithiasis management of Asian patients in Singapore.

作者信息

Lim Ee Jean, Choo Zhen Wei, Mangat Reshma, Durai Pradeep, Biligere Sarvajit, Tan Yiquan, Yeung Marcus Loh Hin, Seet Li Ting Nicole Andrea, Heng Chin Tiong, Ferreti Stefania, Gauhar Vineet

机构信息

Urology Department, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

Urology Department, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

Asian J Urol. 2024 Apr;11(2):324-330. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.03.013. Epub 2022 Oct 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajur.2022.03.013
PMID:38680586
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11053326/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Double-J (DJ) ureteric stents are commonly placed perioperatively for semirigid or flexible ureteroscopic renal surgery. It is believed that lesser stent material within the bladder mitigates stent-related symptoms. This study aimed to evaluate the J-Fil ureteral stent, a single pigtail suture stent compared with conventional DJ stent in relation to stent symptoms in an Asian population undergoing ureterorenal intervention.

METHODS

Based on internal audit committee recommendation approval, the records of 50 patients retrieved, available data of 41 patients who were prospectively enrolled into two groups (Group 1 [J-Fil stent group], =21 and Group 2 [DJ stent group], =20) between August 2020 to January 2021, were analysed. Parameters compared were nature of procedure, stone location and size, ease of deployment or removal, and complications. A modified universal stent symptom questionnaire was used to assess morbidity of stent symptoms within 48 h of insertion and at removal.

RESULTS

Both groups had similar median age, distribution in male to female ratio, and stone size. The overall median universal stent symptom questionnaire score at insertion was similar for bladder pain, flank or loin pain, and quality of life between Group 1 and 2; however, at removal Group 1 fared significantly better than Group 2, especially for flank or loin pain and pain at voiding. Both groups had similar ease in insertion with no hospital readmissions.

CONCLUSION

Our audit favoured the single pigtail suture stent in Asian ureters in mitigating stent-related issues. It showed a good safety profile with easy deployment and removal. It promises a new standard in stenting.

摘要

目的

双J(DJ)输尿管支架常用于半硬性或软性输尿管镜肾脏手术的围手术期。人们认为,膀胱内较少的支架材料可减轻与支架相关的症状。本研究旨在评估J-Fil输尿管支架,一种单猪尾缝合支架,与传统DJ支架相比,在接受输尿管肾干预的亚洲人群中与支架症状的关系。

方法

根据内部审计委员会的建议批准,检索了50例患者的记录,分析了2020年8月至2021年1月期间前瞻性纳入两组(第1组[J-Fil支架组],=21;第2组[DJ支架组],=20)的41例患者的可用数据。比较的参数包括手术性质、结石位置和大小、放置或取出的难易程度以及并发症。使用改良的通用支架症状问卷评估插入后48小时内和取出时支架症状的发病率。

结果

两组的年龄中位数、男女比例分布和结石大小相似。第1组和第2组在插入时膀胱疼痛、胁腹或腰部疼痛以及生活质量方面的总体通用支架症状问卷中位数得分相似;然而,在取出时,第1组的情况明显优于第2组,尤其是在胁腹或腰部疼痛以及排尿疼痛方面。两组插入时的难易程度相似,均无再次入院情况。

结论

我们的审计结果表明,单猪尾缝合支架在减轻亚洲输尿管患者与支架相关的问题方面更具优势。它具有良好的安全性,放置和取出都很容易。它有望成为支架置入的新标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a75/11053326/221c3cd3d0cf/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a75/11053326/b7429a97464b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a75/11053326/221c3cd3d0cf/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a75/11053326/b7429a97464b/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8a75/11053326/221c3cd3d0cf/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Outcomes of a non-randomised audit of single pigtail suture stents in urolithiasis management of Asian patients in Singapore.新加坡亚洲患者尿路结石管理中单猪尾缝线支架非随机审计的结果
Asian J Urol. 2024 Apr;11(2):324-330. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.03.013. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
2
Pigtail Suture Stents Significantly Reduce Stent-related Symptoms Compared to Conventional Double J Stents: A Prospective Randomized Trial.与传统双J支架相比,猪尾缝线支架显著减轻支架相关症状:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021 May 10;29:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.03.011. eCollection 2021 Jul.
3
Patients undergoing double J substitution with a pigtail suture stent report a significant decrease of stent-related symptoms. Results from a prospective multicenter longitudinal trial.患者在接受双 J 替代治疗时使用猪尾缝线支架,报告支架相关症状显著减少。一项前瞻性多中心纵向研究的结果。
World J Urol. 2024 Mar 22;42(1):186. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04879-5.
4
Clinical Effectiveness of Single Pigtail Suture Stent on Patient Comfort: A Double-Blind Prospective Randomized Trial.单猪尾缝线支架对患者舒适度的临床效果:一项双盲前瞻性随机试验。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Nov;30(11):1183-1188. doi: 10.1089/lap.2020.0127. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
5
Short-term external ureter stenting shows significant benefit in comparison to routine double-J stent placement after ureterorenoscopic stone extraction: A prospective randomized trial - the Fast track stent study (FaST).与输尿管镜取石术后常规双J支架置入相比,短期外置输尿管支架置入显示出显著优势:一项前瞻性随机试验——快速通道支架研究(FaST)。
Int J Urol. 2018 Aug;25(8):717-722. doi: 10.1111/iju.13711. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
6
Ureteric stenting vs not stenting following uncomplicated ureteroscopic lithotripsy: A prospective randomised trial.单纯输尿管镜碎石术后输尿管支架置入与不置入的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Arab J Urol. 2020 May 19;18(3):169-175. doi: 10.1080/2090598X.2020.1762280.
7
Transient stent placement versus tubeless procedure after ureteroscopy retrograde surgery stone extraction (Fast Track Stent study 2): A randomized prospective evaluation.输尿管镜逆行取石术后短暂支架置入与无管化处理的前瞻性随机对照研究(Fast Track Stent 研究 2)
Int J Urol. 2020 Sep;27(9):749-754. doi: 10.1111/iju.14291. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
8
[Pigtail suture stent: decisive progress towards double-pigtail stent tolerance and unexpected properties of the suture in the ureter].猪尾缝线支架:在双猪尾支架耐受性方面取得的决定性进展以及缝线在输尿管中的意外特性
Prog Urol. 2014 Jun;24(7):441-50. doi: 10.1016/j.purol.2013.12.007. Epub 2014 Feb 10.
9
Reduction of stent-associated morbidity by minimizing stent material: a prospective, randomized, single-blind superiority trial assessing a customized 'suture stent'.通过最小化支架材料减少支架相关并发症:一项前瞻性、随机、单盲优效性试验,评估一种定制的“缝合支架”。
BJU Int. 2021 May;127(5):596-605. doi: 10.1111/bju.15290. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
10
Changing the double-pigtail stent by a new suture stent to improve patient's quality of life: a prospective study.采用新型缝合支架更换双猪尾支架以改善患者生活质量:一项前瞻性研究。
World J Urol. 2015 Aug;33(8):1061-8. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1394-2. Epub 2014 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Does intraoperative surgeon reported stone free status (IO-SFS) correlate with CT based post operative stone free status (PO-SFS) in flexible ureteroscopy using flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) in real-world practice? A prospective global FANS collaborative study group initiative with the section of EAU endourology.在实际临床实践中,使用可弯曲且可导航的输尿管吸引鞘(FANS)进行输尿管软镜检查时,术者报告的术中结石清除状态(IO-SFS)与基于CT的术后结石清除状态(PO-SFS)是否相关?一项由欧洲泌尿外科学会(EAU)腔内泌尿外科分会发起的全球FANS前瞻性合作研究。
World J Urol. 2025 Mar 21;43(1):184. doi: 10.1007/s00345-025-05570-z.
2
Letter to the editor for the article "Risk factors of early infectious complications after ureterorenoscopy for stone disease: a prospective study".
World J Urol. 2024 Jun 3;42(1):367. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05072-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Pigtail Suture Stents Significantly Reduce Stent-related Symptoms Compared to Conventional Double J Stents: A Prospective Randomized Trial.与传统双J支架相比,猪尾缝线支架显著减轻支架相关症状:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2021 May 10;29:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2021.03.011. eCollection 2021 Jul.
2
In Vivo Evaluation of a Novel Pigtail Suture Stent.新型猪尾缝线支架的体内评估
Urology. 2021 Feb;148:83-87. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.11.031. Epub 2020 Nov 27.
3
Histological Inflammation in Human Ureter either Healthy or Fitted with Double-Pigtail Stent or a Thin 0.3 F Suture Thread: A Preliminary Study.
人类输尿管组织学炎症研究:健康输尿管、双猪尾支架置入输尿管或0.3F细缝线缝合输尿管的初步研究
Adv Urol. 2020 Jul 2;2020:1204897. doi: 10.1155/2020/1204897. eCollection 2020.
4
Ureteric stents: Overview of current clinical applications and economic implications.输尿管支架:当前临床应用及经济影响概述。
Int J Urol. 2020 Jan;27(1):7-15. doi: 10.1111/iju.14119. Epub 2019 Sep 23.
5
Ureteral stents in urolithiasis.尿路结石中的输尿管支架
Asian J Urol. 2018 Oct;5(4):274-286. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2018.07.002. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
6
MiniJFil®: A New Safe and Effective Stent for Well-Tolerated Repeated Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy or Ureteroscopy for Medium-to-Large Kidney Stones?MiniJFil®:一种用于中大型肾结石的新型安全有效支架,是否适用于耐受性良好的重复体外冲击波碎石术或输尿管镜检查?
Nephrourol Mon. 2016 Aug 13;8(5):e40788. doi: 10.5812/numonthly.40788. eCollection 2016 Sep.
7
Ureteral Stent-Associated Pain: A Review.输尿管支架相关疼痛:综述
J Endourol. 2016 Jul;30(7):744-53. doi: 10.1089/end.2016.0129. Epub 2016 May 23.
8
Changing the double-pigtail stent by a new suture stent to improve patient's quality of life: a prospective study.采用新型缝合支架更换双猪尾支架以改善患者生活质量:一项前瞻性研究。
World J Urol. 2015 Aug;33(8):1061-8. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1394-2. Epub 2014 Sep 12.
9
Is a 22 cm Ureteric Stent Appropriate for Korean Patients Smaller than 175 cm in Height?对于身高低于175厘米的韩国患者,22厘米的输尿管支架合适吗?
Korean J Urol. 2010 Sep;51(9):642-6. doi: 10.4111/kju.2010.51.9.642. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
10
Ureteral stent discomfort: Etiology and management.输尿管支架不适:病因与处理
Indian J Urol. 2009 Oct-Dec;25(4):455-60. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.57910.