Raskin Marissa, Keller Nicole E, Agee Laura A, Shumake Jason, Smits Jasper A J, Telch Michael J, Otto Michael W, Lee Hongjoo J, Monfils Marie-H
Institute for Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Department of Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2024 Mar 22;4(3):100310. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2024.100310. eCollection 2024 May.
Cues present during a traumatic event may result in persistent fear responses. These responses can be attenuated through extinction learning, a core component of exposure therapy. Exposure/extinction is effective for some people, but not all. We recently demonstrated that carbon dioxide (CO) reactivity predicts fear extinction memory and orexin activation and that orexin activation predicts fear extinction memory, which suggests that a CO challenge may enable identification of whether an individual is a good candidate for an extinction-based approach. Another method to attenuate conditioned responses, retrieval-extinction, renders the original associative memory labile via distinct neural mechanisms. The purpose of the current study was to examine whether we could replicate previous findings that retrieval-extinction is more effective than extinction at preventing the return of fear and that CO reactivity predicts fear memory after extinction. We also examined whether CO reactivity predicts fear memory after retrieval-extinction.
Male rats first underwent a CO challenge and fear conditioning and were assigned to receive either standard extinction ( = 28) or retrieval-extinction ( = 28). Then, they underwent a long-term memory (LTM) test and a reinstatement test.
We found that retrieval-extinction resulted in lower freezing during extinction, LTM, and reinstatement than standard extinction. Using the best subset approach to linear regression, we found that CO reactivity predicted LTM after extinction and also predicted LTM after retrieval-extinction, although to a lesser degree.
CO reactivity could be used as a screening tool to determine whether an individual may be a good candidate for an extinction-based therapeutic approach.
创伤事件中出现的线索可能导致持续的恐惧反应。这些反应可通过消退学习来减弱,消退学习是暴露疗法的核心组成部分。暴露/消退对一些人有效,但并非对所有人都有效。我们最近证明,二氧化碳(CO)反应性可预测恐惧消退记忆和食欲素激活,且食欲素激活可预测恐惧消退记忆,这表明CO激发可能有助于确定个体是否是基于消退方法的合适人选。另一种减弱条件反应的方法,即提取-消退,通过不同的神经机制使原始联想记忆变得不稳定。本研究的目的是检验我们是否能够重复先前的发现,即提取-消退在防止恐惧复发方面比消退更有效,以及CO反应性在消退后预测恐惧记忆。我们还检验了CO反应性在提取-消退后是否预测恐惧记忆。
雄性大鼠首先接受CO激发和恐惧条件训练,然后被分配接受标准消退(n = 28)或提取-消退(n = 28)。然后,它们接受长期记忆(LTM)测试和恢复测试。
我们发现,与标准消退相比,提取-消退在消退、LTM和恢复过程中导致更低的僵立不动。使用线性回归的最佳子集方法,我们发现CO反应性在消退后预测LTM,并且在提取-消退后也预测LTM,尽管程度较小。
CO反应性可作为一种筛选工具,以确定个体是否可能是基于消退的治疗方法的合适人选。