Abi-Rafeh Jad, Sebag Victoria, ElHawary Hassan, Zammit Dino, Gilardino Mirko S
Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2024 May;32(2):339-346. doi: 10.1177/22925503221108468. Epub 2022 Jul 5.
The COVID-19 pandemic imparted an important shift in strategies postgraduate surgical programs use to recruit, interact with, and select medical students applying through the Canadian Resident Matching Service (CaRMS). With this unprecedented shift toward virtual applicant selection, this study sought to explore and analyze perspectives of the first cohort of program directors (PDs) and applicants who participated in this process. A cross-sectional survey study was designed using Google Forms for both PDs and applicants participating in the 2021 CaRMS surgical subspecialty selection process. Questions pertained to format and content of virtual engagement methods, the interview itself, as well as advice for future applicants. Thirty-five PDs and 40 successful applicants (n = 75) participated in the study. Cost reduction was the most commonly reported benefit of online interviewing by PDs (85%), followed by efficiency (71%), enhanced resource management (49%), and ability to conduct more interviews (23%). Strong letters of reference (80%) and interview performance (74%) remained the most significant factors in virtual applicant selection. Attendance to virtual recruitment events did not increase the likelihood of offering interviews (n = 24, 69% of PDs), although the ability to perform in-person electives held tremendous value. Most applicants (90%) reported on virtual information sessions as the best method for learning about programs; work culture and environment were topics most valued as discussion points (90%). Successful applicants provided an average confidence of 76% regarding their suitability with their matched programs. Seventy-three percent of applicants (n = 29) had either a preference for virtual interviews or were equivocal, while 51.4% of PDs (n = 18) preferred interviews to be conducted virtually for future cohorts. Trainees are entering residency with confidence following a virtual selection process, and PDs feel confident in their selections. Although no clear consensus exists regarding preference for virtual or in-person interviews, several advantages for virtual resident selection exist. The influence of an in-person elective was found difficult to replace, regardless of interview format. The importance of applicant engagement with programs prior to interviews is highlighted and discussed with recommendations provided for best practices.
新冠疫情使研究生外科项目在通过加拿大住院医师匹配服务(CaRMS)招募、与申请医学生互动及选拔方面的策略发生了重大转变。随着向虚拟申请人选拔的这一前所未有的转变,本研究旨在探索和分析参与这一过程的首批项目主任(PDs)和申请人的观点。针对参与2021年CaRMS外科亚专业选拔过程的PDs和申请人,使用谷歌表单设计了一项横断面调查研究。问题涉及虚拟参与方法的形式和内容、面试本身以及对未来申请人的建议。35名PDs和40名成功申请人(n = 75)参与了该研究。成本降低是PDs报告的在线面试最常见的好处(85%),其次是效率(71%)、资源管理增强(49%)以及能够进行更多面试(23%)。有力的推荐信(80%)和面试表现(74%)仍然是虚拟申请人选拔中最重要的因素。参加虚拟招聘活动并没有增加获得面试机会的可能性(n = 24,69%的PDs),尽管进行面对面选修的能力具有巨大价值。大多数申请人(90%)报告称虚拟信息发布会是了解项目的最佳方式;工作文化和环境是最受重视的讨论话题(90%)。成功申请人对自己与匹配项目的适配度平均信心为76%。73%的申请人(n = 29)要么倾向于虚拟面试,要么态度模棱两可,而51.4%的PDs(n = 18)倾向于未来批次的面试以虚拟方式进行。经过虚拟选拔过程,学员们自信地进入住院医师阶段,PDs对他们的选拔也充满信心。虽然对于虚拟面试还是面对面面试没有明确的共识,但虚拟住院医师选拔存在一些优势。无论面试形式如何,人们发现面对面选修的影响难以替代。强调了申请人在面试前与项目互动的重要性,并进行了讨论,同时提供了最佳实践建议。