Suppr超能文献

Investigating factors underlying why householders remain in at-risk areas during bushfire disaster in Australia.

作者信息

Adedokun Olufisayo, Egbelakin Temitope, Sher Willy, Gajendran Thayaparan

机构信息

School of Architecture and Built Environment, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, 2308, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Apr 16;10(8):e29727. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29727. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.

Abstract

Although most homes lack design and construction features to withstand bushfires, there is a growing trend of householders relocating to bushfire-prone areas. Notably, many bushfire-related fatalities have occurred within proximity, specifically within 100 m of bushland. Therefore, this paper explores the factors that drive householders to remain in at-risk areas, despite the imminent threat of bushfires. Thirty semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants residing in the southeastern region of New South Wales (NSW). The interviews were recorded, transcribed using Otter.AI, and subjected to thematic analysis using NVivo 12 Pro. The findings shed light on why certain householders decided to stay on their properties during the catastrophic 2019/2020 bushfires. Upon analysis, we uncovered thirty-six distinct factors that underlie householders' choices to remain during bushfires. These factors were categorized into nine groups: protection-related, attitude-related, information-related, operation-related, road-related, shelter-related, finance-related, health-related, and rebuilding-related factors. The study underscores the importance of understanding gender-based differences and pet ownership in bushfire evacuation decisions, emphasizing the need for tailored communication strategies. These findings hold several important implications for research and practice regarding early self-evacuation from bushfires.

摘要
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d1b/11053178/8edb71eb6e07/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Investigating factors underlying why householders remain in at-risk areas during bushfire disaster in Australia.
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 16;10(8):e29727. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29727. eCollection 2024 Apr 30.
3
The black summer bushfires: impacts and risk factors for livestock bushfire injury in south-eastern Australia.
Aust Vet J. 2022 Jul;100(7):306-317. doi: 10.1111/avj.13165. Epub 2022 May 5.
5
Impact of bushfires on Australian livestock health, welfare and carcase quality.
Prev Vet Med. 2023 Dec;221:106054. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2023.106054. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
8
The long-term impact of bushfires on the mental health of Australians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2022 Jun 28;13(1):2087980. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2022.2087980. eCollection 2022.
9
Coping styles and mental health outcomes of community members affected by black summer 2019-20 bushfires in Australia.
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2022 Oct;31(5):1176-1185. doi: 10.1111/inm.13035. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
10
Exploring Pharmacists' Roles during the 2019-2020 Australian Black Summer Bushfires.
Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Aug 19;9(3):142. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9030142.

本文引用的文献

2
Semistructured interviewing in primary care research: a balance of relationship and rigour.
Fam Med Community Health. 2019 Mar 8;7(2):e000057. doi: 10.1136/fmch-2018-000057. eCollection 2019.
3
Urban Green Space: Creating a Triple Win for Environmental Sustainability, Health, and Health Equity through Behavior Change.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Nov 11;16(22):4403. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16224403.
4
Does Place Attachment Predict Wildfire Mitigation and Preparedness? A Comparison of Wildland-Urban Interface and Rural Communities.
Environ Manage. 2016 Jan;57(1):148-62. doi: 10.1007/s00267-015-0597-7. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
5
Qualitative Research: Data Collection, Analysis, and Management.
Can J Hosp Pharm. 2015 May-Jun;68(3):226-31. doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v68i3.1456.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验