Axe santé des populations et pratiques optimales en santé, Centre de recherche du CHU de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Département de médecine sociale et préventive, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Environ Health Perspect. 2024 Apr;132(4):47014. doi: 10.1289/EHP13556. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
Previous studies have identified the consumption of country foods (hunted/harvested foods from the land) as the primary exposure source of perfluoroalkyl acids (PFAA) in Arctic communities. However, identifying the specific foods associated with PFAA exposures is complicated due to correlation between country foods that are commonly consumed together.
We used venous blood sample data and food frequency questionnaire data from the ("How are we now?") 2017 (Q2017) survey of Inuit individuals y of age residing in Nunavik (). Adaptive elastic net, a machine learning technique, identified the most important food items for predicting PFAA biomarker levels while accounting for the correlation among the food items. We used generalized linear regression models to quantify the association between the most predictive food items and six plasma PFAA biomarker levels. The estimates were converted to percent changes in a specific PFAA biomarker level per standard deviation increase in the consumption of a food item. Models were also stratified by food type (market or country foods).
Perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), perfluorodecanoic acid (PFDA), and perfluoroundecanoic acid (PFUnDA) were associated with frequent consumption of beluga (rendered fat) [14.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 10.3%, 18.9%; 14.6% (95% CI: 10.1%, 19.0%)], seal liver [9.3% (95% CI: 5.0%, 13.7%); 8.1% (95% CI: 3.5%, 12.6%)], and (fish roe mixed with berries and fat) [6.0% (95% CI: 1.3%, 10.7%); 7.5% (95% CI: 2.7%, 12.3%)]. Beluga was also associated with higher concentrations of perfluorohexanesulphonic acid (PFHxS) and perfluorononanoic acid (PFNA), albeit with lower percentage changes. PFHxS, perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), and PFNA followed some similar patterns, with higher levels associated with frequent consumption of ptarmigan [6.1% (95% CI: 3.2%, 9.0%); 5.1% (95% CI: 1.1%, 9.1%); 5.4% (95% CI: 1.8%, 9.0%)]. Among market foods, frequent consumption of processed meat and popcorn was consistently associated with lower PFAA exposure.
Our study identifies specific food items contributing to environmental contaminant exposure in Indigenous or small communities relying on local subsistence foods using adaptive elastic net to prioritize responses from a complex food frequency questionnaire. In Nunavik, higher PFAA biomarker levels were primarily related to increased consumption of country foods, particularly beluga , seal liver, , and ptarmigan. Our results support policies regulating PFAA production and use to limit the contamination of Arctic species through long-range transport. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13556.
先前的研究已经确定食用土产食物(从土地上猎捕或采集的食物)是北极社区中全氟烷基酸(PFAA)的主要暴露源。然而,由于经常一起食用的土产食物之间存在相关性,因此确定与 PFAA 暴露相关的具体食物变得很复杂。
我们使用静脉血样数据和来自努纳武特()2017 年(Q2017)的食物频率问卷数据(“我们现在怎么样了?”),该调查针对的是居住在努纳武特的年龄在 y 岁的因纽特人。自适应弹性网络,一种机器学习技术,在考虑食物项目之间相关性的同时,确定了预测 PFAA 生物标志物水平的最重要食物项目。我们使用广义线性回归模型来量化最具预测性的食物项目与六种血浆 PFAA 生物标志物水平之间的关联。这些估计值转换为特定 PFAA 生物标志物水平每标准偏差增加时的变化百分比,以增加对食物项目的消费。模型还按食物类型(市场或土产食物)进行分层。
全氟辛烷磺酸(PFOS)、全氟癸酸(PFDA)和全氟十一烷酸(PFUnDA)与频繁食用 beluga(加工脂肪)[14.6%;95%置信区间(CI):10.3%,18.9%;14.6%(95%CI:10.1%,19.0%)]、海豹肝脏[9.3%(95%CI:5.0%,13.7%);8.1%(95%CI:3.5%,12.6%)]和(鱼卵混合浆果和脂肪)[6.0%(95%CI:1.3%,10.7%);7.5%(95%CI:2.7%,12.3%)]有关。 beluga 也与较高浓度的全氟己烷磺酸(PFHxS)和全氟壬酸(PFNA)有关,尽管变化百分比较低。PFHxS、全氟辛酸(PFOA)和 PFNA 遵循一些类似的模式,较高水平与频繁食用松鸡有关[6.1%(95%CI:3.2%,9.0%);5.1%(95%CI:1.1%,9.1%);5.4%(95%CI:1.8%,9.0%)]。在市场食品中,经常食用加工肉类和爆米花与较低的 PFAA 暴露量有关。
我们的研究使用自适应弹性网络确定了特定的食物项目,这些项目通过优先考虑来自复杂食物频率问卷的反应,使用自适应弹性网络确定了特定的食物项目,这些项目对依赖当地自给食物的土著或小社区的环境污染物暴露产生影响。在努纳武特,较高的 PFAA 生物标志物水平主要与食用土产食物(尤其是 beluga、海豹肝脏、和松鸡)的增加有关。我们的研究结果支持了有关全氟烷基酸生产和使用的政策,以限制通过远距离传输对北极物种的污染。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13556.