Hino Haruka, Suzuki Taku, Maekawa Kazuya, Ita Reiko, Sasa Anna, Kulvanich Sirima, Takei Eri, Magara Jin, Tsujimura Takanori, Inoue Makoto
Division of Dysphagia Rehabilitation, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
Department of Community Dentistry & Gerodontology, Faculty of Dentistry, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
J Oral Rehabil. 2024 Aug;51(8):1422-1432. doi: 10.1111/joor.13709. Epub 2024 Apr 29.
Modification of foods or liquids is commonly administered as part of dysphagia treatment. However, no consensus exists on the parameters for defining texture-modified food for patients with dysphagia.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of food/liquid material on swallowing physiology in patients with dysphagia and to discuss the optimal food choice for direct swallowing therapy.
A total of 140 patients underwent a videofluoroscopic swallowing study using three test foods/liquids: 3 mL of mildly thick liquid (Thick liquid), jelly made of agar and polysaccharide (Jelly) and jelly made of pectin (Reset gel). Outcome measures of videofluoroscopic images, bolus transit time and hyoid movements were compared.
The frequency of chewing movements was highest for Jelly, followed by Reset gel and Thick liquid. While the probability of oral residue was the highest for Reset gel, pharyngeal residue after swallowing was high for Thick liquid as compared to Jelly and Reset gel. Oral transit time and pharyngeal transit time for Thick liquid were significantly smaller than that for Jelly and Reset gel. Pharyngeal delay time was significantly smaller for Thick liquid than that for Jelly and Reset gel. There was no difference in hyoid elevation time and hyoid movement time among the conditions.
Mildly thick liquid material may be optimal for patients with primarily oral motor function impairment and jelly, such as Reset gel, may be more suitable for patients with primarily pharyngeal motor function impairment or oral and pharyngeal coordinative motor function decline.
食物或液体的改良通常作为吞咽困难治疗的一部分进行。然而,对于吞咽困难患者质地改良食物的定义参数尚无共识。
本研究旨在评估食物/液体材料对吞咽困难患者吞咽生理的影响,并探讨直接吞咽治疗的最佳食物选择。
共有140名患者使用三种测试食物/液体进行了视频荧光吞咽造影研究:3毫升轻度浓稠液体(浓稠液体)、由琼脂和多糖制成的果冻(果冻)以及由果胶制成的果冻(复位凝胶)。比较了视频荧光造影图像、食团通过时间和舌骨运动的结果指标。
果冻的咀嚼运动频率最高,其次是复位凝胶和浓稠液体。虽然复位凝胶的口腔残留概率最高,但与果冻和复位凝胶相比,浓稠液体吞咽后的咽部残留较高。浓稠液体的口腔通过时间和咽部通过时间明显短于果冻和复位凝胶。浓稠液体的咽部延迟时间明显短于果冻和复位凝胶。不同条件下舌骨抬高时间和舌骨运动时间没有差异。
轻度浓稠液体材料可能最适合主要存在口腔运动功能障碍的患者,而果冻,如复位凝胶,可能更适合主要存在咽部运动功能障碍或口腔与咽部协调运动功能下降的患者。