Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual "Júlio de Mesquita Filho," Botucatu, Brazil.
Escola de Enfermagem, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Integr Complement Med. 2024 Sep;30(9):819-831. doi: 10.1089/jicm.2023.0419. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
This systematic review aims to assess the impact of music therapy and musical interventions on neuropsychiatric outcomes among patients with moderate and severe mental disorders, in comparison with conventional treatment in isolation. The review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. A comprehensive search was conducted on November 16, 2021, using the following databases and search interfaces: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Embase, SCOPUS, Web of Science; PubMed, PsycINFO, Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde, and Scientific Electronic Library Online. Two authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion criteria, extracted the data, and evaluated the quality of the included studies using critical appraisal tools. In total, 17 studies were included, 9 of which were randomized controlled trials. The experimental studies involved 5,082 adult and elderly patients. The most prevalent symptoms assessed in the studies were anxiety, depression, and positive and negative symptoms of psychotic disorders. Music interventions were predominantly conducted by music therapists and nurses, providing passive interventions with the selection of musical repertoire by therapists and patients. The frequency with which musical interventions occurred varied greatly in terms of session duration, number of times per week, and number of times during the day. The identified study designs included clinical and quasi-experimental studies. In terms of methodological quality, clinical studies showed weaknesses regarding deviations from intended interventions. The effectiveness of music therapy and musical interventions for neuropsychiatric symptoms in patients with moderate and severe mental disorders was evident in quasi-experimental and clinical studies with satisfactory methodological quality. Musical interventions, in various forms of application, represent an interdisciplinary therapeutic tool that complements and enhances conventional treatment. Unlike conventional treatments, the immersive and integrative nature of music interventions allows access to both intrapersonal and interpersonal dimensions during periods of psychic suffering. These findings highlight the importance of researchers addressing methodological limitations, such as deviations from intended interventions, and advocate for the expansion the use of music in community treatment settings.
本系统评价旨在评估音乐治疗和音乐干预对中重度精神障碍患者神经精神结局的影响,与单独的常规治疗相比。本综述遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目指南。于 2021 年 11 月 16 日,使用以下数据库和搜索界面进行了全面搜索:护理与联合健康文献累积索引、Embase、SCOPUS、Web of Science;PubMed、PsycINFO、拉丁美洲和加勒比地区卫生科学文献、以及科学电子图书馆在线。两名作者独立评估研究是否符合纳入标准,提取数据,并使用批判性评价工具评估纳入研究的质量。共纳入 17 项研究,其中 9 项为随机对照试验。实验研究涉及 5082 名成年和老年患者。研究中评估的最常见症状是焦虑、抑郁以及精神病性障碍的阳性和阴性症状。音乐干预主要由音乐治疗师和护士进行,提供被动干预,由治疗师和患者选择音乐曲目。音乐干预的发生频率在疗程持续时间、每周次数和每天次数方面差异很大。确定的研究设计包括临床和准实验研究。就方法学质量而言,临床研究在偏离预期干预方面存在弱点。音乐治疗和音乐干预对中重度精神障碍患者神经精神症状的有效性在具有满意方法学质量的准实验和临床研究中得到了证实。音乐干预以各种应用形式,代表了一种补充和增强常规治疗的跨学科治疗工具。与常规治疗不同,音乐干预的沉浸式和整体性允许在精神痛苦期间进入个体内部和人际维度。这些发现强调了研究人员解决方法学限制的重要性,例如偏离预期干预,并倡导在社区治疗环境中扩大音乐的使用。