Kankam Philip Kwaku, Acheampong Lawrencia Donkor, Dei DeGraft Johnson
Department of Information Studies, University of Ghana, Ghana.
Crops Research Institute, CSIR, Ghana.
Heliyon. 2024 Mar 25;10(7):e28605. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e28605. eCollection 2024 Apr 15.
This study investigated the perceptions and factors that researchers had about Open Access (OA) publishing, specifically how it affected their decision to publish or not. The Diffusion of Innovation Theory by Rogers served as the study's main guide, and 15 research scientists from Ghana's Council of Scientific and Industrial Research's Crop Research Institute provided qualitative data for the study through semi-structured interviews and the interpretivist research paradigm. Convenience sampling was used to choose the participants, and thematic analysis was used to analyse and present the research results in themes. The study's conclusions showed that all of the participants benefited from OA and that they were all aware of its application for disseminating scientific information. High Article Processing Charges (APC) and credibility issues were also mentioned in the study as significant obstacles to using OA for the dissemination of scientific information. The study suggests that in order for scientists to use Open Access (OA) for the sharing of scientific information, they must be given the means to distinguish trustworthy journals from predatory ones.
本研究调查了研究人员对开放获取(OA)出版的看法及相关因素,特别是其如何影响他们的出版决策。罗杰斯的创新扩散理论作为该研究的主要指导,来自加纳科学与工业研究理事会作物研究所的15位研究科学家通过半结构化访谈和解释主义研究范式为该研究提供了定性数据。采用便利抽样法选择参与者,并运用主题分析法对研究结果进行分析和呈现。研究结论表明,所有参与者都从开放获取中受益,并且他们都意识到其在传播科学信息方面的应用。研究中还提到,高额的文章处理费(APC)和可信度问题是使用开放获取传播科学信息的重大障碍。该研究表明,为了让科学家能够利用开放获取(OA)来共享科学信息,必须给予他们区分可信期刊和掠夺性期刊的方法。