Dong Tian-Xiang, Wang Dong, Zhao Qun, Zhang Zhi-Dong, Zhao Xue-Feng, Tan Bi-Bo, Liu Yu, Liu Qing-Wei, Yang Pei-Gang, Ding Ping-An, Zheng Tao, Li Yong, Liu Zi-Jing
Third Department of Surgery of the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Comprehensive Treatment of Gastric Cancer, Shijiazhuang 050011, Hebei Province, China.
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Apr 27;16(4):1109-1120. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i4.1109.
The incidence of gastric cancer has significantly increased in recent years. Surgical resection is the main treatment, but the method of digestive tract reconstruction after gastric cancer surgery remains controversial. In the current study, we sought to explore a reasonable method of digestive tract reconstruction and improve the quality of life and nutritional status of patients after surgery. To this end, we statistically analyzed the clinical results of patients with gastric cancer who underwent jejunal interposition double-tract reconstruction (DTR) and esophageal jejunum Roux-en-Y reconstruction (RY).
To explore the application effect of DTR in total laparoscopic radical total gastrectomy (TLTG) and evaluate its safety and efficacy.
We collected the relevant data of 77 patients who underwent TLTG at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University from October 2021 to January 2023. Among them, 35 cases were treated with DTR, and the remaining 42 cases were treated with traditional RY. After 1:1 propensity score matching, the cases were grouped into 31 cases per group, with evenly distributed data. The clinical characteristics and short- and long-term clinical outcomes of the two groups were statistically analyzed.
The two groups showed no significant differences in basic data, intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph node dissections, first defecation time after operation, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications, and laboratory examination results on the 1, 3, and 5 days after operation. The operation time of the DTR group was longer than that of the RY group [(307.58 ± 65.14) min (272.45 ± 62.09) min, = 0.016], but the first intake of liquid food in the DTR group was shorter than that in the RY group [(4.45 ± 1.18) d (6.0 ± 5.18) d, = 0.028]. The incidence of reflux heartburn (Visick grade) and postoperative gallbladder disease in the DTR group was lower than that in the RY group ( = 0.033 and = 0.038). Although there was no significant difference in body weight, hemoglobin, prealbumin, and albumin between the two groups at 1,3 and 6 months after surgery, the diet of patients in the DTR group was better than that in the RY group ( = 0.031).
The clinical effect of DTR in TLTG is better than that of RY, indicating that it is a more valuable digestive tract reconstruction method in laparoscopic gastric cancer surgery.
近年来胃癌发病率显著上升。手术切除是主要治疗方法,但胃癌手术后消化道重建方式仍存在争议。在本研究中,我们试图探索一种合理的消化道重建方法,提高患者术后生活质量和营养状况。为此,我们对接受空肠间置双通道重建(DTR)和食管空肠Roux-en-Y重建(RY)的胃癌患者的临床结果进行了统计分析。
探讨DTR在全腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术(TLTG)中的应用效果,并评估其安全性和有效性。
收集2021年10月至2023年1月在河北医科大学第四医院接受TLTG的77例患者的相关数据。其中,35例采用DTR治疗,其余42例采用传统RY治疗。经过1:1倾向评分匹配后,将病例分为每组31例,数据分布均匀。对两组患者的临床特征及短期和长期临床结局进行统计分析。
两组患者的基本资料、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数目、术后首次排便时间、术后住院时间、术后并发症以及术后第1、3、5天的实验室检查结果均无显著差异。DTR组手术时间长于RY组[(307.58±6²±62.09)分钟;P=0.016],但DTR组首次进流食时间短于RY组[(4.45±1.18)天比(6.0±5.18)天;P=0.028]。DTR组反流性烧心(Visick分级)和术后胆囊疾病的发生率低于RY组(P=0.033和P=0.038)。虽然两组患者术后1、3、6个月时体重、血红蛋白、前白蛋白和白蛋白水平无显著差异,但DTR组患者的饮食情况优于RY组(P=0.031)。
DTR在TLTG中的临床效果优于RY,表明它是腹腔镜胃癌手术中一种更具价值的消化道重建方法。