Hamdi Ahmed, Kallala Rim, Harzallah Belhassen
Faculty of Dental Medicine Monastir Tunisia; University of Monastir.
Faculty of Dental Medicine Monastir Tunisia, University of Monastir, Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Laboratory of Dental Anatomy, Research Laboratory of Occlusodontics and Ceramic Prostheses LR16ES15, 5000 Monastir, Tunisia.
Saudi Dent J. 2024 Apr;36(4):633-637. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.12.016. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
The study aimed to assess and compare both the chewing efficiency and the contact area between class I and class II of Angle's malocclusions.
A total of 120 individuals aged between 19 and 30 years were examined and were divided into two groups according to Angle's class (Class I and class II). The chewing efficiency was quantified using the ViewGum software and two-colored chewing gum. The contact area was quantified using modeling wax and MATLAB software. All data were collected, then, analyzed using SPSS software 21. Data normality was checked through kurtosis test. Descriptive results were calculated. Matched sample t-tests were used to compare chewing efficiency measurements between right and left sides. Independent t-tests were used to compare chewing efficiency and the contact area between class I and class II of Angle's malocclusions. Linear regression and Pearson correlation were used to assess the correlation between chewing efficiency and the contact area. The significance level was fixed at p = 0.05.
For group 1, the mean hue value on both sides was 0.086 ± 0.058. For group 2, it was 0.095 ± 0.055. The difference between both groups was statistically significant (p = 0.03). For group 1, the mean contact area was 49.91 ± 21.47 mm. For group 2, it was 51.42 ± 19.76 mm. The difference was statistically not significant (p = 0.4). The correlation between the contact area and the chewing efficiency in both groups was statistically significant and it was negative (in class I p = 0 and R = -0.616; in class II p = 0.01 and R = -0.408).
The Chewing is better for patients with Angle's Class I malocclusion. The contact area is higher. Larger occlusal contact area leads to higher masticatory efficiency. Further studies should be conducted.
本研究旨在评估和比较安氏Ⅰ类与Ⅱ类错牙合畸形患者的咀嚼效率及接触面积。
共检查了120名年龄在19至30岁之间的个体,并根据安氏分类(Ⅰ类和Ⅱ类)分为两组。使用ViewGum软件和双色口香糖对咀嚼效率进行量化。使用模型蜡和MATLAB软件对接触面积进行量化。然后收集所有数据,使用SPSS 21软件进行分析。通过峰度检验检查数据正态性。计算描述性结果。使用配对样本t检验比较左右两侧的咀嚼效率测量值。使用独立t检验比较安氏Ⅰ类与Ⅱ类错牙合畸形患者的咀嚼效率和接触面积。使用线性回归和Pearson相关性评估咀嚼效率与接触面积之间的相关性。显著性水平设定为p = 0.05。
对于第1组,两侧的平均色调值为0.086±0.058。对于第2组,为0.095±0.055。两组之间的差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.03)。对于第1组,平均接触面积为49.91±21.47mm。对于第2组,为51.42±19.76mm。差异无统计学意义(p = 0.4)。两组中接触面积与咀嚼效率之间的相关性具有统计学意义且为负相关(Ⅰ类中p = 0且R = -0.616;Ⅱ类中p = 0.01且R = -0.408)。
安氏Ⅰ类错牙合畸形患者的咀嚼功能更好。接触面积更大。更大的咬合接触面积导致更高的咀嚼效率。应进行进一步研究。