• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血压变异性与无慢性肾脏病的高血压患者肾功能下降风险的关联:一项 Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial 研究的事后分析。

Association between blood pressure variability and risk of kidney function decline in hypertensive patients without chronic kidney disease: a post hoc analysis of Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Anzhen Hospital.

Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan Province, China.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2024 Jul 1;42(7):1203-1211. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003715. Epub 2024 Mar 8.

DOI:10.1097/HJH.0000000000003715
PMID:38690929
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Blood pressure variability (BPV) is a risk factor for poor kidney function independent of blood pressure (BP) in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Little is known about the association between kidney function decline and BPV in hypertensive patients without CKD.

METHODS

A post-hoc analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) was performed. BPV was measured as standard deviation (SD) and average real variability (ARV). Cox proportional hazard models were employed to explore the relationship between BPV and incident CKD and albuminuria.

RESULTS

A total of 5700 patients were included, with a mean age of 66.4 years old. During a median of 3.29 years follow-up, 150 (2.6%) patients developed CKD and 222 (7.2%) patients developed albuminuria. Patients were divided into four groups according to the quartiles of BPV. Compared with SBPV Q1, the incidence of CKD was higher in SBPV Q2-Q4; hazard ratios and 95% confidence interval were 1.81 (1.07-3.04), 1.85 (1.10-3.12) and 1.90 (1.13-3.19), respectively. The association between incident CKD and albuminuria with DBPV was less significant than SBPV. Similar results were found when measuring BPV as ARV and SD. No interaction was detected in BP-lowering strategy and SBPV on incident CKD and albuminuria ( P  > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

This study found that BPV was a risk factor for incident CKD and albuminuria in patients without CKD, especially SBPV. Although intensive BP control increased the risk of CKD, the association between SBPV and kidney function decline did not differ between the two treatment groups.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ , Unique identifier: NCT01206062.

摘要

背景

血压变异性(BPV)是慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者血压(BP)以外肾功能不良的危险因素。在没有 CKD 的高血压患者中,肾功能下降与 BPV 之间的关系知之甚少。

方法

对收缩压干预试验(SPRINT)进行了事后分析。BPV 以标准差(SD)和平均真实变异性(ARV)来衡量。使用 Cox 比例风险模型探讨了 BPV 与新发 CKD 和白蛋白尿之间的关系。

结果

共纳入 5700 例患者,平均年龄 66.4 岁。在中位数为 3.29 年的随访期间,150 例(2.6%)患者发生 CKD,222 例(7.2%)患者发生白蛋白尿。根据 BPV 的四分位数将患者分为四组。与 SBPV Q1 相比,SBPV Q2-Q4 的 CKD 发生率更高;风险比和 95%置信区间分别为 1.81(1.07-3.04)、1.85(1.10-3.12)和 1.90(1.13-3.19)。DBPV 与新发 CKD 和白蛋白尿之间的关联不如 SBPV 明显。以 ARV 和 SD 衡量 BPV 时,也得到了类似的结果。在降压策略和 SBPV 对新发 CKD 和白蛋白尿的影响中,未检测到交互作用(P>0.05)。

结论

本研究发现,BPV 是无 CKD 患者新发 CKD 和白蛋白尿的危险因素,尤其是 SBPV。尽管强化 BP 控制增加了 CKD 的风险,但两组治疗中 SBPV 与肾功能下降之间的关联并无差异。

登记

网址:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ ,独特标识符:NCT01206062。

相似文献

1
Association between blood pressure variability and risk of kidney function decline in hypertensive patients without chronic kidney disease: a post hoc analysis of Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial study.血压变异性与无慢性肾脏病的高血压患者肾功能下降风险的关联:一项 Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial 研究的事后分析。
J Hypertens. 2024 Jul 1;42(7):1203-1211. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003715. Epub 2024 Mar 8.
2
Effects of Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Patients with and without Albuminuria: Analyses from SPRINT.伴有和不伴有蛋白尿的患者强化血压控制的效果:SPRINT 分析。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2020 Aug 7;15(8):1121-1128. doi: 10.2215/CJN.12371019. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
3
Relation between blood pressure variability and early renal damage in hypertensive patients.高血压患者血压变异性与早期肾损害的关系。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2017 May;21(9):2226-2231.
4
Short-term Blood Pressure Variability and Incident CKD in Patients With Hypertension: Findings From the Cardiovascular and Metabolic Disease Etiology Research Center-High Risk (CMERC-HI) Study.短期血压变异性与高血压患者的慢性肾脏病事件:来自心血管和代谢疾病病因学研究中心-高危(CMERC-HI)研究的结果。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2023 Apr;81(4):384-393.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.08.017. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
5
Effect of visit-to-visit blood pressure variability on mild cognitive impairment and probable dementia in hypertensive patients receiving standard and intensive blood pressure treatment.就诊间血压变异性对接受标准和强化血压治疗的高血压患者轻度认知障碍和可能痴呆的影响。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Apr 17;10:1166554. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1166554. eCollection 2023.
6
Initial Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate Decline and Long-Term Renal Function During Intensive Antihypertensive Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SPRINT and ACCORD-BP Randomized Controlled Trials.强化降压治疗期间初始估算肾小球滤过率下降与长期肾功能:SPRINT 和 ACCORD-BP 随机对照试验的事后分析。
Hypertension. 2020 May;75(5):1205-1212. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14659. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
7
Relationship of short-term blood pressure variability with carotid intima-media thickness in hypertensive patients.高血压患者短期血压变异性与颈动脉内膜中层厚度的关系
Biomed Eng Online. 2015 Jul 24;14:71. doi: 10.1186/s12938-015-0059-8.
8
Short-term blood pressure variability in nondialysis chronic kidney disease patients: correlates and prognostic role on the progression of renal disease.非透析慢性肾脏病患者的短期血压变异性:与疾病进展的相关性及其预后作用。
J Hypertens. 2018 Dec;36(12):2398-2405. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001825.
9
Annual deterioration of renal function in hypertensive patients with and without diabetes.患有和未患糖尿病的高血压患者肾功能的年度恶化情况。
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017 Jun 26;13:231-237. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S135253. eCollection 2017.
10
Visit-to-Visit Variability of BP and CKD Outcomes: Results from the ALLHAT.血压与慢性肾脏病结局的就诊间变异性:抗高血压和降脂治疗预防心脏病发作试验(ALLHAT)的结果
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016 Mar 7;11(3):471-80. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04660415. Epub 2016 Feb 18.