Ng'oma Mwawi, Atif Najia, Meltzer-Brody Samantha, Chirwa Ellen, Stewart Robert C
Department of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi.
Programs Department, St John of God Hospitaller Services, Lilongwe, Malawi.
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024 May 1;4(5):e0002128. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002128. eCollection 2024.
Despite the evidence for the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions for perinatal depression, their uptake is low in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Reasons for this include the lack of contextually adapted interventions and mental health specialists to deliver them. This study aimed to test the acceptability and feasibility of a psychosocial intervention for perinatal depression, the Thinking Healthy Programme-Peer Delivered, adapted for use in rural Malawi. A multi-method evaluation of feasibility and acceptability of the intervention was conducted using a one-group pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design and an exploratory qualitative study. Pre-post intervention change in depression scores (paired t-test) and recruitment, retention and session adherence rates were calculated. Qualitative data were collected through 29 in-depth interviews (22 mothers and 7 peer volunteers) and 1 Focus Group Discussion (18 mothers). Thematic analysis approach was used to analyse qualitative data. Seven (7) out of 8 peer volunteers were successfully trained to deliver the intervention. A total of 31 pregnant women with Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) score ≥12 were offered intervention, of whom 24 were enrolled (recruitment rate 77.4%). Out of these 24 women, 22 completed the intervention (retention rate 91.6%). Mean difference between pre- and post-test EPDS scores one week after 8th session was 7.59 (95% CI 4.98 to 10.19), p<0.001. Qualitative evaluation showed that the intervention was acceptable despite some challenges including stigma and issues around incentivization of peer volunteers. The Thinking Healthy Programme-Peer Delivered, adapted for use in Malawi, was feasible to deliver and acceptable to its target population. The intervention may be useful in management of perinatal depression in primary care settings in Malawi. However, definitive trials are needed to evaluate its effectiveness.
尽管有证据表明社会心理干预对围产期抑郁症有效,但在低收入和中等收入国家,其采用率较低。原因包括缺乏因地制宜的干预措施以及提供这些干预措施的心理健康专家。本研究旨在测试一种针对围产期抑郁症的社会心理干预措施——同伴实施的“健康思考计划”在马拉维农村地区使用的可接受性和可行性。采用单组前测-后测准实验设计和探索性定性研究对该干预措施的可行性和可接受性进行了多方法评估。计算了干预前后抑郁评分的变化(配对t检验)以及招募率、留存率和课程依从率。通过29次深入访谈(22名母亲和7名同伴志愿者)和1次焦点小组讨论(18名母亲)收集了定性数据。采用主题分析方法对定性数据进行分析。8名同伴志愿者中有7名成功接受了实施干预措施的培训。共有31名爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)评分≥12的孕妇被提供干预措施,其中24名登记参加(招募率77.4%)。在这24名妇女中,22名完成了干预(留存率91.6%)。第8次课程后一周,测试前和测试后EPDS评分的平均差异为7.59(95%CI 4.98至10.19),p<0.001。定性评估表明,尽管存在一些挑战,包括耻辱感和同伴志愿者激励方面的问题,但该干预措施是可接受的。同伴实施的“健康思考计划”在马拉维进行了调整,实施起来是可行的,并且为目标人群所接受。该干预措施可能有助于马拉维初级保健机构中围产期抑郁症的管理。然而,需要进行确定性试验来评估其有效性。